On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Srinath Perera <[email protected]> wrote:
> Switching to architecture@ as this is technical discussion. > > Hi Sanjiva, Isabelle, > > We have two choices > > > 1. Let user define/ configure Analytics (e.g. Alerts) via a UI. Each > alerts is shown as a policy, and users can enable and configure it > > Who is "user" here? This is the person publishing the API, or subscribing the API or administrator? If it is admin only, then +1 for configuration files. > > 1. Enable this only via config files ( No UI) > > > WDYT? Nuwan have raised valid issues ( see below). They can be addressed, > but would be bit complicated. > > I am inclined to go for config only approach. ( which fit better with No > Carbon Console approach) > > We need to agree and do one thing for all analytics things. > > --Srinath > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Nuwan Dias <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 5:44 PM > Subject: Re: [APIM Analytics] Update on current progress > To: Srinath Perera <[email protected]> > Cc: Mohanadarshan Vivekanandalingam <[email protected]>, Nirmal Fernando < > [email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, > Vidura Gamini Abhaya <[email protected]>, Sachith Withana <[email protected]>, > Fazlan Nazeem <[email protected]>, Tishan Dahanayakage <[email protected]>, > Upul Bandara <[email protected]>, Maheshakya Wijewardena <[email protected]>, > Janaka Ranabahu <[email protected]>, Tharindu Dharmarathna < > [email protected]>, Sachini Jayasekara <[email protected]> > > > Hi Srinath, > > Its fine to have a simple UI. It would look nice. > > However, please consider these when developing the UI (these are actual > problems we've come across in support). > > 1. When there are a cluster of DAS nodes, to which does the UI connect and > how are the configs replicated? > 2. When the admin username changes on DAS, what needs to be done on APIM? > 3. Having a UI makes it possible to change values during runtime. How do > these affect the runtime's behaviour? > 4. The UI should not be the only way of configuring these params, dev ops > need to automate deployment. So think of that too. > > There can be more complications to address. Anyhow, if its tough to find > solutions to any of these programatically we need to have reasonable > answers/workarounds to address them. > > Thanks, > NuwanD. > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Srinath Perera <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Nuwan, when we chatted, we said lets have a simple UI to configure. >> >> If we dropping the UI, we need to talk to all stakeholders and agree. >> >> --Srinath >> >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Mohanadarshan Vivekanandalingam < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Nuwan, >>> >>> I hope you can remember that we discussed the need for a UI (similar to >>> CEP execution manager) to define thresholds/ to get parameter values for >>> some conditions in queries. Specially for CEP queries likewise there is a >>> requirement whether we need get parameter/threshold values for some spark >>> queries as well.. >>> >>> Do you think that we don't required a UI for this ? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Mohan >>> >>> >>> >>> -- S.Uthaiyashankar VP Engineering WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com/ - "lean . enterprise . middleware" Phone: +94 714897591
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
