On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Sameera Jayasoma <[email protected]> wrote:

> Btw, who are the consumers of these messages? User can develop their own
> tools to monitor artifact deployment.
>
> We also can come with CEP query to analyze whether the artifact deployment
> happened successfully in a cluster and display this information in a
> dashboard. We can come up with a DAS C-App.
>

+1 for the idea.

The initial phase that is described in this thread is to provide the
deployment status notifications. Coordination will be the next step on top
of this.



>
> Thanks,
> Sameera.
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Sameera Jayasoma <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I believe we need both here.
>>
>> In JMS case, we need to publish events to a topic rather than a queue.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sameera.
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Srinath Perera <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Kasun, I would go with JMS as it gives event persistence and you will
>>> not loose the events even if listener is restarted.
>>>
>>> --Srinath.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:45 AM, KasunG Gajasinghe <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Given several issues we discovered with automatic artifact
>>>> synchronization with DepSync in C4, we have discussed how to approach this
>>>> problem in C5.
>>>>
>>>> We are thinking of not doing the automated artifact synchronization in
>>>> C5. Rather, users should use their own mechanism to synchronize the
>>>> artifacts across a cluster. Common approaches are RSync as a cron job and
>>>> shell scripts.
>>>>
>>>> But, it is vital to know the artifact deployment status of the nodes in
>>>> the entire cluster from a central place. For that, we are providing this
>>>> deployment coordination feature. There will be two ways to use this.
>>>>
>>>> 1. JMS based publishing - the deployment status will be published by
>>>> each node to a jms topic/queue
>>>>
>>>> 2. Log based publishing - publish the logs by using a syslog appender
>>>> [1] or our own custom appender to a central location.
>>>>
>>>> The log publishing may not be limited to just the deployment
>>>> coordination. In a containerized deployment, the carbon products will run
>>>> in disposable containers. But sometimes, the logs need to be backed up for
>>>> later reference. This will help with that.
>>>>
>>>> Any thoughts on this matter?
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/appenders.html#SyslogAppender
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> KasunG
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> ~~--~~
>>>> Sending this mail via my phone. Do excuse any typo or short replies
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ============================
>>> Srinath Perera, Ph.D.
>>>    http://people.apache.org/~hemapani/
>>>    http://srinathsview.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sameera Jayasoma,
>> Software Architect,
>>
>> WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
>> email: [email protected]
>> blog: http://blog.sameera.org
>> twitter: https://twitter.com/sameerajayasoma
>> flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/sameera-jayasoma/collections
>> Mobile: 0094776364456
>>
>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Sameera Jayasoma,
> Software Architect,
>
> WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
> email: [email protected]
> blog: http://blog.sameera.org
> twitter: https://twitter.com/sameerajayasoma
> flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/sameera-jayasoma/collections
> Mobile: 0094776364456
>
> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>
>


-- 

*Kasun Gajasinghe*Senior Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc.
email: kasung AT spamfree wso2.com
linked-in: http://lk.linkedin.com/in/gajasinghe
blog: http://kasunbg.org
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Reply via email to