Whats the waiting strategy that is being used in Disrupter? And is the
maximum of Disrupter in all configuration is 2 ?

Suho


On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Chanaka Fernando <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Isuru,
>
> Have we tested on the pure passthrough scenarios? According to the
> results, we cannot see much performance difference in using disruptor over
> thread pool. Shall we do some testing around passthrough scenarios and
> verify?
>
> Cheers,
> Chanaka
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Isuru Ranawaka <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We have working on decoupling engine thread model from transport thread
>> model.Previously carbon transport was included with the Disruptor and
>> according to the behaviour of MSF4J it is very hard to mapped custom logics
>> written using MSF4J to Disruptor thread model in order to gain better
>> performance. So we have moved Disruptor thread model to carbon-gateway and
>> carbon-transport is kept with Netty thread pool.
>>
>> According to current implementation carbon-transport will dispatch events
>> to registered message processor via Netty worker threads and there after it
>> operates under engine level thread model.
>>
>> Following is the Thread model diagram for Integration Server.
>>
>> [image: gw_thread_model.png]
>>
>> Basically it works as follows
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    CPU bound mediators are working on CPU bound disruptor threads.
>>    -
>>
>>    IO bound mediators are working on IO bound disruptor threads.
>>    -
>>
>>    We assume custom mediators are written in bad way and may contain
>>    blocking calls so those are executed using IO bound mediator.
>>    -
>>
>>    We have included ThreadPool implementation as well and can switch
>>    between ThreadPool based model or Disruptor based model.
>>
>> This is for we haven’t yet finalized exact thread model and we  keep
>> testing with different mediators how both are behaving according to
>> different parameters like TPS, memory, startup time ,latency , .etc
>>
>>
>> Following are some of the tests results we have conducted with  both
>> thread model  implementations for two main scenarios.
>>
>> Machine Details
>>
>> Server :-  32 core machine with 64 GB memory
>>
>> Back End Service :-  Netty based Echo Service which has TPS around 100000
>>
>> Tested message size :- 4kb
>>
>> Server startup Time with Disruptor :- 1.34 s
>>
>> Server startup time without Disruptor :- 1.38 s
>>
>> Use case:-
>>
>> (CPU + IO)
>>
>> Header based routing with File Writing .One message path is writing
>> message to file and other one sends messages to Echo service and respond
>> back to client.
>>
>> TPS
>>
>> [image: image1.png]
>>
>> Latency
>>
>> [image: image2.png]
>>
>> Memory
>>
>> Disruptor
>>
>> [image: disruptor.png]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thread Pool
>>
>> [image: threadpoolMemory.png]
>>
>> Use case:-
>>
>> (CPU )
>>
>> Header based routing ,   send messages to Echo service and respond back
>> to client.
>>
>> TPS
>>
>> [image: image3.png]
>>
>> Latency
>>
>> [image: image4.png]
>>
>>
>> For test results please look in to [1]
>>
>> [1]
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1A2dxknP1xEJKBpl4ymbQD2Mt9kWywYCI-60j16JVLx0/edit#gid=0
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> IsuruR
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards
>> Isuru Ranawaka
>> M: +94714629880
>> Blog : http://isurur.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thank you and Best Regards,
> Chanaka Fernando
> Senior Technical Lead
> WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
> lean.enterprise.middleware
>
> mobile: +94 773337238
> Blog : http://soatutorials.blogspot.com
> LinkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/pub/chanaka-fernando/19/a20/5b0
> Twitter:https://twitter.com/chanakaudaya
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>
>


-- 

*S. Suhothayan*
Technical Lead & Team Lead of WSO2 Complex Event Processor
*WSO2 Inc. *http://wso2.com
* <http://wso2.com/>*
lean . enterprise . middleware


*cell: (+94) 779 756 757 | blog: http://suhothayan.blogspot.com/
<http://suhothayan.blogspot.com/>twitter: http://twitter.com/suhothayan
<http://twitter.com/suhothayan> | linked-in:
http://lk.linkedin.com/in/suhothayan <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/suhothayan>*
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Reply via email to