Hi Manoj, How are those multiple managers going to sync artifacts between each other using rsync? LB will route traffic only to 1st manager node and the 2nd manager node as the fail-over, right? If all the managers try to push artifacts to workers then there will be conflicts/overwrites.
I think the whole artifacts deployment/sync strategy is going to be changed from C5 on-wards. AFAIU, we will not be publishing artifacts to gateway nodes directly in C5. Rather those artifacts will be injected at the Docker image build process. So why don't we stick with SVN based DepSync for now (C4 products)? What is the problem that we are trying to solve by moving to rsync that we couldn't/cannot fix in SVN based model? Thanks.
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
