Hi Shankar,

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar <[email protected]
> wrote:

> Hi Sameera,
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Sameera Jayasoma <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> We introduced this new design to solve the issues in the previous secure
>> vault implementation. We've simplified the configuration of secure vault
>> module with this new design.
>>
>> Now we don't maintain passwords or any sensitive data in the
>> configuration files.  All such data should be maintained in the
>> *secret.properties* file. We will see whether we can use YAML as the
>> file format here.
>>
>> When you develop Carbon components and if you happen to introduce configs
>> which contain passwords, you shouldn't put the actual password there. Just
>> put a secret alias in your config file and add an entry the
>> secret.properties file.
>>
>
>
> There is an operational issue here. A component should be a self
> contained. If the component author introduced a secret alias, he shouldn't
> update in a "central" secret.properties. Not all the people will have write
> access to the repo having "central" secret.properties, so they should send
> PR if they have to update that file. That will break the component self
> contained model. Can we keep the secret.properties fragments with the
> component itself and merge when installing the features?
>


+1 for the fragments approach. With this approach components will introduce
a set of files. Thats is the only concern.

Anyway as per our discusion, I will start another thread to discuss this
aspect.

Thanks,
Sameera.

>
>
>
>> This should happen at the development time. End users do not need to
>> worry such configurations. But if they want to change passwords, they can
>> change them only in the secret.properties file.
>>
>> e.g. Consider the carbon.yml file. You should put a secret alias such as,
>>
>>         password: ${secvault:carbon.security.keystore.password}
>>
>> Now you need put an entry in the secret.properties file as follows.
>>
>>         carbon.security.keystore.password=[wso2carbon]
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sameera.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Nipuni Perera <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> We are trying to add Carbon secure-vault support to C5.
>>>
>>> We have done some changes to the way how we configure ciphertool and
>>> securevault in C5 compared to C4. Please find the new design details below:
>>>
>>> There are two configuration files that we maintain for Ciphertool and
>>> Securevault:
>>>
>>>     [1]. *secrets.properties* - This file will contains the
>>> secret-allias and secrets (encrypted/or plain-text). Act as the file-based
>>> secret repository. We define all the passwords/secrets which need to be
>>> secured in this file.
>>>          eg:   SecureVault.Keystore.Password=[wso2carbon]
>>>                  Carbon.Security.KeyStore.Password=[somepassword]
>>>
>>>     [2]. *secure-vault.yaml* - This file will have the main
>>> configurations (eg: default secret repository implementation, default
>>> Callbackhandler implementation etc)
>>>         eg:    carbon.secretProvider:
>>> org.wso2.securevault.secret.handler.SecretManagerSecretCallbackHandler
>>>                  keystore.identity.type: JKS
>>>         keystore.identity.store.password: identity.store.password
>>>
>>> The CipherTool will be used for creating encrypted values for given
>>> plain text secrets in the *secrets**.properties* [1].
>>>
>>> If a user need to make a value secure,
>>>
>>>    1.  they have to add a unique name (alias) to their carbon
>>>    configuration element (eg: a value of an element in carbon.yml)
>>>    2. add the same unique-name along with the plain-text password to
>>>    the *secrets.properties* file.
>>>
>>> *Example:*
>>>
>>> Assume that we need to secure a value "password" under element
>>> "Security/Keystore" in Carbon.yml configuration. First we add a unique a
>>> alias as the value to the Password as below [3]. Second we add that unique
>>> alias with its plain text password to *secrets*.properties file[4].
>>>
>>> CipherTool will encrypt the plain-text password and replace the
>>> plain-text password with the encrypted value. (In c4 we have added
>>> plain-text passwords within square brackets. If not they are identified as
>>> encrypted values).
>>>
>>> When loading the carbon.yml (or any other custom configuration file), we
>>> read the secured values using secure-vault service. This secure vault
>>> service will either return the password from the *secrets*.properties
>>> file if the secret is not encrypted, OR return the encrypted value.
>>>
>>> [3]
>>> ################################################################################
>>>
>>>    id: carbon-kernel           #Value to uniquely identify a server
>>>    name: WSO2 Carbon Kernel        #Server Name
>>>    version: 5.1.0-SNAPSHOT  #Server Version
>>>    tenant: default      #Tenant Name
>>>
>>>    # Keystore used by this server
>>>    Security:
>>>       Keystore
>>>          Password: Carbon.Security.Keystore.Password
>>>
>>>  
>>> ###############################################################################
>>>
>>> [4]  Carbon.Security.Keystore.Password=[wso2carbon]
>>>
>>>
>>> *New design decisions taken compared to C4 SecureVault implementation:*
>>>
>>>    1. We have removed the usage of cipher-tool.properties file. (This
>>>    file was used to keep the alias, the location to the configuration file,
>>>    and the xpath to the secret element in the configuration file).
>>>    2. We can support any format of configuration file with this model
>>>    as we only care about the secret-key that we define in the 
>>> *secrets*.properties
>>>    file and do not depend on the xpath to find the location of the secret
>>>    element.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Nipuni
>>>
>>> --
>>> Nipuni Perera
>>> Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>> Email: [email protected]
>>> Git hub profile: https://github.com/nipuni
>>> Blog : http://nipunipererablog.blogspot.com/
>>> Mobile: +94 (71) 5626680
>>> <http://wso2.com>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sameera Jayasoma,
>> Software Architect,
>>
>> WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
>> email: [email protected]
>> blog: http://blog.sameera.org
>> twitter: https://twitter.com/sameerajayasoma
>> flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/sameera-jayasoma/collections
>> Mobile: 0094776364456
>>
>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Architecture mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> S.Uthaiyashankar
> VP Engineering
> WSO2 Inc.
> http://wso2.com/ - "lean . enterprise . middleware"
>
> Phone: +94 714897591
>
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>
>


-- 
Sameera Jayasoma,
Software Architect,

WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
email: [email protected]
blog: http://blog.sameera.org
twitter: https://twitter.com/sameerajayasoma
flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/sameera-jayasoma/collections
Mobile: 0094776364456

Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Reply via email to