(By DI, i mean the DI design patten) On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Manuranga Perera <[email protected]> wrote:
> DI is good for rapid development of specific applications, > > -1, DI is for real and long lasting application. Google heavily promotes > it for their internal devs, and they have the large and long-term projects. > It's not for RAD. We should use DI, it makes code more understandable and > testable. > -- > With regards, > *Manu*ranga Perera. > > phone : 071 7 70 20 50 > mail : [email protected] > -- With regards, *Manu*ranga Perera. phone : 071 7 70 20 50 mail : [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
