+1 Azeez. And, we should not blindly add them either. In the latest carbon-commons version, the INFO message box displays the license text. [1] :(
[1] https://github.com/wso2/carbon-commons/issues/273 On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Afkham Azeez <[email protected]> wrote: > I was wondering whether we really need the license header in config files. > These are files that will be edited by the users, and it really doesn't > make much sense to have the license there, and also it makes the files > unnecessarily long. > > How about removing the license headers from config files, going forward? > > -- > *Afkham Azeez* > Senior Director, Platform Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com > Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/ > * <http://www.apache.org/>* > *email: **[email protected]* <[email protected]> > * cell: +94 77 3320919 <077%20332%200919>blog: **http://blog.afkham.org* > <http://blog.afkham.org> > *twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez* > <http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez> > *linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez > <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez>* > > *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware* > > _______________________________________________ > Architecture mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture > > -- *Kasun Gajasinghe*Associate Technical Lead, WSO2 Inc. email: kasung AT spamfree wso2.com linked-in: http://lk.linkedin.com/in/gajasinghe blog: http://kasunbg.org phone: +1 650-745-4499, 77 678 0813
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
