On 20/03/07, Joakim Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
John Tolentino wrote: > Hi Joakim, > > I'd like to add a web application to deploy new artifacts into the > repository (MRM-305). This matches #3 in > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Archiva+Requirements. It > appears that no one's been doing something like this but I could be > mistaken. Actually, #3 in the requirements doc refers to the already in-place WebDAV interface. I believe what you are talking about is in the 4th entry for the Archiva 2.0 wishlist. "Workflow for artifact bundle / promotion / deployment." which is intended to be a web form (and workflow) to upload (or reference) bundle content that then goes through an approval process which eventually makes the content available in the repository itself. (I'm sure Carlos would love this feature)
Personally I would prefer to have this feature even it is limited in 1.0. The final target could be to have a really validation workflow with the usage of a bundle, but in a first time we could only add something similar to the deploy:deploy-file functionalities. Arnaud
> Also, there are differences in the Design's > (http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/The+Design+of+Archiva) > directory structure and the svn directory structure. Are you referring > to a different directory structure in the document or is this a plan > to reorganize the current grouping of the sub projects? The design document is part of a desired end goal. We are not (yet) there. - Joakim > > Thanks, > John > > On 3/20/07, Joakim Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Just a quick note to other Archiva Developers that the Product Roadmap >> and Design docs are being updated on wiki (Confluence) >> >> The Roadmap:: >> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Archiva+Roadmap >> >> I think we might need to split up the roadmap to 1.0-alpha, 1.0-beta, >> 1.0-rc, and finally 1.0. WDYT? >> >> The Design Docs:: >> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/The+Design+of+Archiva >> >> As usual, these documents are ongoing and fluid. >> >> Comments are appreciated. >> >> - Joakim >> >
