It's ok now, thanks.
The branch seems to be good and well organized.
Even if I found some NPE when I used the webapp, I'm +1 to use it as trunk.
I don't think you'll can do option B easily, so I vote to option A. You can
move the actual trunk to branches/archiva-0.9.x until the new trunk is stable.
Emmanuel
Joakim Erdfelt a écrit :
Please try again.
All of the unit tests now work on windows.
- Joakim
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Option C: Tests don't work on windows so I can't test it.
When they'll be fixed, I'll be for Option B.
Emmanuel
Joakim Erdfelt a écrit :
Lots of work has been done in the archiva database branch in the past
2 months.
It has come time to start the merge back into trunk and get the help
of others to finish off the work.
I wanted to point people to the branch and let them take a look
around, and then vote.
As I see it we have 3 options.
option A [ ] Make the branch the new trunk.
option B [ ] Merge the branch into the existing trunk.
option C [ ] -1 Do not merge the branch into trunk.
I'll wait the usual 72 hours and tabulate the scores.
Scores will be tabulated around 1:00am Sunday UTC.
I favor option A personally, but I don't know what that will mean to
those people that have trunk currently checked out.
The Branch:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/archiva/branches/archiva-jpox-database-refactor
The Good:
1) Completed Integration of JPOX Database into system.
2) Completely overhauled the repository scanning for performance,
availability, resilience, and capabilities.
3) Completely overhauled the reporting system for growth and use of
the database.
The Bad:
1) Admin screens have not yet been converted to the new
configuration. (that's a priority for me ATM)
2) Automatic Artifact relocation on proxied requests has not been
implemented.
3) Untested.
I'm eager to get the other devs involved ASAP.
While the vote is going on, I'll be alternating between Redback
development and Archiva Admin Screen work.
- Joakim Erdfelt