It's ok now, thanks.

The branch seems to be good and well organized.
Even if I found some NPE when I used the webapp, I'm +1 to use it as trunk.

I don't think you'll can do option B easily, so I vote to option A. You can 
move the actual trunk to branches/archiva-0.9.x until the new trunk is stable.

Emmanuel

Joakim Erdfelt a écrit :
Please try again.

All of the unit tests now work on windows.

- Joakim

Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Option C: Tests don't work on windows so I can't test it.

When they'll be fixed, I'll be for Option B.

Emmanuel

Joakim Erdfelt a écrit :
Lots of work has been done in the archiva database branch in the past 2 months.

It has come time to start the merge back into trunk and get the help of others to finish off the work.

I wanted to point people to the branch and let them take a look around, and then vote.

As I see it we have 3 options.

option A [ ] Make the branch the new trunk.
option B [ ] Merge the branch into the existing trunk.
option C [ ] -1 Do not merge the branch into trunk.

I'll wait the usual 72 hours and tabulate the scores.
Scores will be tabulated around 1:00am Sunday UTC.

I favor option A personally, but I don't know what that will mean to those people that have trunk currently checked out.

The Branch:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/archiva/branches/archiva-jpox-database-refactor

The Good:
1) Completed Integration of JPOX Database into system.
2) Completely overhauled the repository scanning for performance, availability, resilience, and capabilities. 3) Completely overhauled the reporting system for growth and use of the database.

The Bad:
1) Admin screens have not yet been converted to the new configuration. (that's a priority for me ATM) 2) Automatic Artifact relocation on proxied requests has not been implemented.
3) Untested.

I'm eager to get the other devs involved ASAP.

While the vote is going on, I'll be alternating between Redback development and Archiva Admin Screen work.

- Joakim Erdfelt









Reply via email to