On 03/08/2007, at 10:18 PM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
That translation (explanation?) is *far* easier to understand than
the URL you pointed to.
heh, lawyers :) Glad I'm useful for something!
Teody said on this thread yesterday that he was working on updates
based on the feedback Deng had given in the issue, so if that
patch looks ok too and gets applied, we'll then need to deal with
this before we can move forward with the release next week.
The current set of patches are already applied.
We'll have to kinda/sorta undo them.
I haven't looked at the submitted patch - but yeah if it's not based
on an svn up it might need to be rolled back first. No big deal.
I was going to take a look after completing MRM-430 tonight, but if
you want to run with it feel free!
Cheers,
Brett
