On 10/09/2007, at 7:12 AM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
Joakim - any thoughts on these 2 additional questions? I'd like to
finish tidying this section up soon.
Cheers,
Brett
Not sure what constitutes the 2 additional questions.
They were the ones with the quesiton marks ;p
Here's what I think you're responses are from your mail:
I didn't want to have the merge contents from multiple sources in
order to produce a report.
Makes sense, but I can't see where it is actually used?
I think you covered this in your mail - it doesn't.
And the structure of the plexus-registry basically forced me into
using the configuration approach over the db approach.
how so?
I still don't really understand what you are getting at here, but we
have to be able to store configuration outside the database.
The reporting would use the database.
Given the use cases below, I don't see any reason why the reporting
couldn't match the configuration model to the fields in the database.
But let's cross that bridge when we come to it.
I'll double check the use. At first glance it didn't appear to be
working properly before, so I intended to comment it out until it was
used.
Thanks,
Brett
--
Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
