On 10/16/07, Joakim Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ArchivaArtifactConsumer is an abstract-dealing-with-artifacts consumer. > RepositoryContentConsumer is for files. > > A file that isn't an artifact can be *.xml, *.sha1, *.md5, > maven-metadata.xml, bad content, poorly named content, etc. > > Would it be better to state the phase/scan instead? > > RepositoryContentConsumer becomes -> RepositoryScanConsumer > ArchivaArtifactConsumer becomes -> DatabaseScanConsumer
All artifacts _are_ repository content, are they not? And even after the renaming... it can't be in the database unless it's in the repository. I understand scanning the filesystem to update the database. But when and why do you "scan" the database? -- Wendy
