Agrea about java-sources, was just for testing.

This is an anoying issue as some maven1 core plugins (plugin-plugin and
scm-plugin) refer to jaxen-1.0-FCS-full, "full" beeing a classifier in m2
repo.

I understand you don't want to break for the N'th time the maven1 legacy
handling.

Could we just consider some "exception-list" in the legacy to Artifact
discovery ? A property-file based solution would allow archiva admin to
solve such issues with fiew impacts on archiva.

Nico.


2007/11/13, Joakim Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> The path "org.apache.commons/jars/commons-io-1.3.2-sources.jar" is in
> the wrong place.
> That source jar should be in
> "org.apache.commons/java-sources/commons-io-1.3.2-sources.jar"
>
> Example: org.apache.camel/java-sources/camel-script-1.1.0-sources.jar
>
> Again, m1 repos do not support classifiers.
> The only reason this specific case works is that there is a special case
> specific mapping for ...
>   (type) "java-source" to (extension) "-sources.jar"
>
> The current m1 file repo on people.apache.or has 1479 source jars in the
> proper place. and 107 in the wrong place.
> If you need classifiers, use maven 2 (that's where it was really
> introduced)
>
> - Joakim
>
> nicolas de loof wrote:
> > That's right, I just forgot those ones :-/
> >
> > Requesting org.apache.commons/jars/commons-io-1.3.2-sources.jar also
> fails
> > and is translated to
> > org/apache/commons/commons-io/1.3.2-sources/commons-io-1.3.2-sources.jar
> >
> >
> > But maybe this is NOT an issue : in maven1 world there is no classifier,
> and
> > my backport should be put in "groupId/backports/artifact-backport.jar",
> the
> > same way -sources.jar are put into "/java-sources/".
> >
> > Nico.
> >
> >
> > 2007/11/13, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> Anything with source or javadoc :)
> >>
> >> - Brett
> >>
> >> On 13/11/2007, at 9:33 AM, nicolas de loof wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> MRM-593
> >>>
> >>> Do you know any artifact in central that uses a classifier ? I'd
> >>> like to
> >>> make the test on a non-SNAPSHOT artifact. Struts does not publish
> >>> it's "j4"
> >>> backported artifacts.
> >>>
> >>> Nico.
> >>>
> >>> 2007/11/13, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>>
> >>>> Thanks again Nicolas - I'm sure this is easily fixed, so it would be
> >>>> worth dropping in JIRA.
> >>>>
> >>>> - Brett
> >>>>
> >>>> On 13/11/2007, at 9:20 AM, nicolas de loof wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> I have a lib that is built by maven2. It also has a retrotranslator
> >>>>> version,
> >>>>> with classifier "-backport", as part of the build process.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> When I deploy a SNAPSHOT of this lib, I get :
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [INFO] [deploy:deploy]
> >>>>> [INFO] Retrieving previous build number from platina
> >>>>> Uploading: ..../jmonit-1.0-alpha-1-SNAPSHOT.jar
> >>>>> 78K uploaded
> >>>>> ...
> >>>>> Uploading: ..../jmonit-1.0-alpha-1-SNAPSHOT-backport.jar
> >>>>> 47K uploaded
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> When I try to get this lib from archiva, I get a 404, as the m1 path
> >>>>> "org.jmonit/jars/jmonit-1.0-alpha-1-SNAPSHOT-backport.jar"
> >>>>> gets converted to
> >>>>> "
> >>>>> org/jmonit/jmonit/1.0-alpha-1-SNAPSHOT-backport/jmonit-1.0-alpha-1-
> >>>>> SNAPSHOT-backport.jar<http://sai1rennes:8888/repository/org/jmonit/
> >>>>> jmonit/1.0-alpha-1-SNAPSHOT-backport/jmonit-1.0-alpha-1-SNAPSHOT-
> >>>>> backport.jar>
> >>>>> "
> >>>>> and not
> >>>>> org/jmonit/jmonit/1.0-alpha-1-SNAPSHOT/jmonit-1.0-alpha-1-SNAPSHOT-
> >>>>> backport.jar<http://sai1rennes:8888/repository/org/jmonit/jmonit/
> >>>>> 1.0-alpha-1-SNAPSHOT-backport/jmonit-1.0-alpha-1-SNAPSHOT-
> >>>>> backport.jar>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --> The classifier is not recognized.
> >>>>> Not tested with other dependencies, but I'm not sure we have good
> >>>>> support
> >>>>> for classifiers as part of m1 requests.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Nico.
> >>>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >> --
> >> Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to