Here's my +1
Initially I was a little skeptical that we could pull off a TLP, I had
this feeling that we hadn't yet reached the level of interest and
participation that Continuum has, but since this email I've been reading
the comments about Archiva online from people using / installing it.
Wow, are people talking about it. So far it's mostly positive. yay!
(Congrats everyone!)
Example: Maven Repository Manager - why we chose Archiva
http://java.dzone.com/blogs/mrjohnsmart/2008/02/19/maven-repository-managers-why-
So, with this week of study, I feel that my own critical view of Archiva
of today is just flat out wrong.
Can it improve? Sure.
Does it work? Very well.
It is perfect? Does it matter? after all what software is perfect? (with
the exception of maybe unix /bin/true and /bin/false)
Looking forward to the TLP. Lets do it.
- Joakim
Brett Porter wrote:
The discussions this week have been pretty healthy, releases going
smoothly, and there is user and developer interest.
Today, Continuum has graduated to be a top level project and I feel
Archiva is well on track. What do others think?
BTW, SVN lists the following committers (snipped a couple of inactive
ones):
aheritier
bayard
bellingard
brett
carlos
dennisl
epunzalan
evenisse
jmcconnell
joakime
jtolentino
nicolas
oching
wsmoak
There is both good numbers and diversity here. Though some have not
committed in a while, many are participating in the dev list so I do
feel like there's enough oversight to move forward. Is there anything
out of date in that list?
Is there anyone lurking that is looking to get involved but not sure
how? :)
Cheers,
Brett
--
- Joakim Erdfelt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Open Source Software (OSS) Developer
