https://news.dyne.org/r/df1a6f1c?m=3786dbf7-d520-4309-8d32-d2933c5bc2d4









Dyne.org Think & Do Tank 
[https://news.dyne.org/r/9682fa17?m=3786dbf7-d520-4309-8d32-d2933c5bc2d4]













Age Verification for Humans 
[https://news.dyne.org/r/6e7b2fcf?m=3786dbf7-d520-4309-8d32-d2933c5bc2d4]









Europe’s age‑verification pilots conflate censorship with guardianship. This 
essay argues for a decentralised approach that separates technical filtering 
from social responsibility.









By Jaromil • 26 Sept 2025


View in browser 
[https://news.dyne.org/r/b778d173?m=3786dbf7-d520-4309-8d32-d2933c5bc2d4]




View in browser 
[https://news.dyne.org/r/a3d013b3?m=3786dbf7-d520-4309-8d32-d2933c5bc2d4]


















 











 















One of the largest experiments in online age verification is now being 
implemented in Europe, which has prompted me to think quite a bit so far, 
especially about the implementation details.






The EU approach to age verification
The European Commission is working towards an EU-harmonised approach to age 
verification.


Shaping Europe’s digital future





[https://news.dyne.org/r/d5743c6c?m=3786dbf7-d520-4309-8d32-d2933c5bc2d4]





I've written extensively about the zero-knowledge algorithm 
[https://news.dyne.org/r/dc482cb0?m=3786dbf7-d520-4309-8d32-d2933c5bc2d4] to be 
used in this EUDI wallet prototype, as well as on how the privacy-preserving 
potential of this great solution is defused 
[https://news.dyne.org/r/62d76427?m=3786dbf7-d520-4309-8d32-d2933c5bc2d4] by 
the way it is deployed.

I'm now here in good spirits after leading the workshop on digital identity for 
a focus retreat held in Berlin, which featured many excellent experts on 
techno-politics and the ethical concerns surrounding identity.






Cypherpunk Retreat
This retreat brings together the top builders and front-line organizers in 
digital privacy to align on roadmaps, drive …


CCYYPPHHEERPUNK RETREATR





[https://news.dyne.org/r/55e97368?m=3786dbf7-d520-4309-8d32-d2933c5bc2d4]





There are many takeaways from this meeting, and I will start highlighting one 
that I believe is the most urgent, emerging from a dialogue with Kyle den 
Hartog 
[https://news.dyne.org/r/aee3800e?m=3786dbf7-d520-4309-8d32-d2933c5bc2d4] 
during our panel session titled:


Can browsers get more than passkeys for identity?

Let's first state that wiring Digital ID access for online content (and through 
web browsers) risks centralising control and reducing user agency: age-based 
access control could become a proxy for censorship.

Speculations aside, one mistake has already been made by age verification 
pilots today: confusing content moderation with guardianship.

This insight is well explored by Kyle's article "Decentralizing Age 
Verification with SSI 
[https://news.dyne.org/r/1916bd2e?m=3786dbf7-d520-4309-8d32-d2933c5bc2d4]"; and 
should not be overlooked. Current age verification laws combine two separate 
issues: content moderation (determining what content is safe/unsafe) and 
guardianship (ensuring children are protected).

> The two problems should be separated!

 * Content moderation → handled locally (on-device or browser-based filtering)
 * Guardianship → enforced by parents and teachers, not centralised authorities


Content Moderation via Client-Side Filtering

This would be similar to Adblock or SafeBrowsing lists and evolve into 
real-time, on-device classification of unsafe content, while users can 
self-moderate or subscribe to trusted third-party lists. It would preserve 
privacy since filtering happens on the device, not the server.


Guardianship via Device/OS-Level Controls:

Schools and parents can enforce filtering policies at the operating system 
level. Browsers/apps block unsafe content by default, but guardians can 
override or log access. Guardianship becomes flexible, reflecting individual 
family or school values. Guardians (parents, teachers) can issue temporary 
digital credentials to grant access.

For example: a parent approves a child’s request to access a blocked site → the 
OS/browser verifies the parent’s credentials. This avoids reliance on a few 
centralised issuers and keeps control distributed.


The elephant in the room

Much of the research necessary to firmly establish DGCNECT's pilot in relation 
to human values is lacking. In this case, it is more than justifiable to adopt 
a decentralised approach that empowers parents, teachers and IT admins in the 
field, rather than relying on centralised governance and ID issuers.

> Age verification is not solely about blocking access to gambling or porn 
> websites.

It also enables the development of contextual policies, such as protecting 
children from suicidal social media trends during specific periods, and 
addressing other phenomena that impact particular linguistic and geographic 
communities at particular times. Additionally, we should consider that 
cyber-attacks targeting our societies might leverage such methods in the future.

Today, the technocratic vision driving all its developments is merely widening 
the problem of the EUDI project, and clearly overlooks societal and human 
factors.

> The absence of interdisciplinary expertise is apparent when rooms are filled 
> solely with engineers.

And so this pilot will be just another crack in the EUDI project: its technical 
implementation sporting shiny cryptography and millions of investments to build 
an "identity wallet to access websites".

I think Europe deserves something better than this; yet, it seems all doors are 
closed to contribution, and the only way to get involved is to rush the 
development of a flawed plan.


Who am I, and further reading

If you like to read further, I've written more about this and other EUDI 
problems






The Seven Sins of European Digital Identity (EUDI)
EUDI as is today presents big problems and disregards criticism, warnings, and 
requests to review technical details, wi…


News From Dyne
•Jaromil




[https://news.dyne.org/r/2b2fc0a5?m=3786dbf7-d520-4309-8d32-d2933c5bc2d4]





I've been working on privacy and identity technology for over a decade, 
primarily in projects funded by the European Commission 
[https://news.dyne.org/r/e1dde219?m=3786dbf7-d520-4309-8d32-d2933c5bc2d4]. 
Among my efforts are decodeproject.eu 
[https://news.dyne.org/r/5b8b3a16?m=3786dbf7-d520-4309-8d32-d2933c5bc2d4] and 
reflowproject.eu 
[https://news.dyne.org/r/3179ca00?m=3786dbf7-d520-4309-8d32-d2933c5bc2d4], 
various academic papers, including SD-BLS 
[https://news.dyne.org/r/1395e024?m=3786dbf7-d520-4309-8d32-d2933c5bc2d4], 
recently published by IEEE. Additionally, with our team at The Forkbomb Company 
[https://news.dyne.org/r/c405d779?m=3786dbf7-d520-4309-8d32-d2933c5bc2d4] we've 
developed products as DIDROOM.com 
[https://news.dyne.org/r/e64b72c3?m=3786dbf7-d520-4309-8d32-d2933c5bc2d4] and 
CREDIMI.io 
[https://news.dyne.org/r/72119990?m=3786dbf7-d520-4309-8d32-d2933c5bc2d4].





















More like this


[https://news.dyne.org/#/feedback/68d67eb619353e0001724856/1/?uuid=3786dbf7-d520-4309-8d32-d2933c5bc2d4&key=8307d71842b4b71614b5c7c696755b7c49d1bd111420430aee463aafab040958]





Less like this


[https://news.dyne.org/#/feedback/68d67eb619353e0001724856/0/?uuid=3786dbf7-d520-4309-8d32-d2933c5bc2d4&key=8307d71842b4b71614b5c7c696755b7c49d1bd111420430aee463aafab040958]














Dyne.org Foundation - Haparandadam 7-A1, 1013AK Amsterdam, Netherlands



News From Dyne © 2025 – Unsubscribe 
[https://news.dyne.org/unsubscribe/?uuid=3786dbf7-d520-4309-8d32-d2933c5bc2d4&key=8307d71842b4b71614b5c7c696755b7c49d1bd111420430aee463aafab040958&newsletter=56c42b8a-2675-410b-9bf0-a988a016699e]



https://ghost.org/?via=pbg-newsletter&ref=news.dyne.org











 




Reply via email to