I even didn't copy the data folder of the v1.4.2 into v.1.5.0. but even after I follow the recommended way by copying the data folder and removing those two subfolders mentioned by Joshua the problem is still there.Peeping into Solr schema, I found field "types" only have the following four types but not resource and digital_object,subject and agent . The missing types may explain why we find no records under every record type tab. Puzzled~ Mang

 *

   12608

     o top_container
       
<http://archives-test.library.rice.edu:8090/#/collection1/query?q=types:%22top_container%22>
 *

   1,169

     o tree_view
       
<http://archives-test.library.rice.edu:8090/#/collection1/query?q=types:%22tree_view%22>
 *

   75

     o archival_object
       
<http://archives-test.library.rice.edu:8090/#/collection1/query?q=types:%22archival_object%22>
 *

   1

     o repository
       
<http://archives-test.library.rice.edu:8090/#/collection1/query?q=types:%22repository%22>


On 9/9/2016 8:52 AM, Sally Vermaaten wrote:
Hi Mang Sun,

I agree with Joshua - this sounds to me like an indexing problem to me. In the course of upgrading to 1.5.0 did you delete the data/solr_index/index directory and all files in the data/indexer_state directory? This is one of the recommended steps in the instructions for upgrading to v.1.5.0 <https://github.com/archivesspace/archivesspace/blob/master/UPGRADING_1.5.0.md>. We accidentally missed this step once in a running a test upgrade and definitely experienced some indexing problems though I don't remember the details. As it was a test upgrade (and it sounds like that's what you're doing as well) we just started afresh and ran the upgrade process over again. When we included that step, things were fine.

On a related note - there's a 1.5.1 release of ArchivesSpace <https://github.com/archivesspace/archivesspace/releases/tag/v1.5.1> that includes several fixes for bugs that were found in the weeks after 1.5.0 was released. If are looking to update to a 1.5.x version, you may want to consider upgrading to 1.5.1 one rather than 1.5.0.

Good luck,
Sally


On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Joshua D. Shaw <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I believe the suggestion for migration to 1.5+ was to delete the
    existing index and indexer states which will trigger a complete
    reindex.

    Best,
    Joshua




    On Sep 9, 2016, at 8:20 AM, "Mang Sun" <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    > i
    >
    > After we migrate our v.1.4.2 test instance to v1.5.0, we can't
    find any records but just no record in Staff interface and public
    interface.
    >
    > But if we open a migrated record (saycollection record) using
    the direct route path to that record and resave it, this record
    but only this one starts to show up under Collections when
    browsing collections. This problem does not come with any new
    record created within v.1.5.0. Any suggestion?
    >
    > Thank you.
    >
    > Mang Sun
    >
    > Rice U.
    >
    >
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list
    > [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    >
    http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group
    <http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group>
    _______________________________________________
    Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group
    <http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group>




--
Sally Vermaaten
Project Manager, Archival Systems
New York University Libraries
1-212-992-6259


_______________________________________________
Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list
[email protected]
http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group

_______________________________________________
Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list
[email protected]
http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group

Reply via email to