I’ll also add that we here at the Rockefeller Archive Center along with some of 
our colleagues at the Bentley Library, Artefactual and the ArchivesSpace team 
have been working on putting together a specification for building out the 
structured rights statements functionality in ArchivesSpace. I think we’re 
pretty close to having something that we can circulate on this list, so stay 
tuned for that if you’re interested in recording machine-actionable rights 
statements!

Hillel
-----------
Hillel Arnold
Assistant Director, Head of Digital Programs
Rockefeller Archive Center
914.366.6382

From: 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 on behalf of "Caldera, Mary" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: Archivesspace Users Group 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Thursday, September 29, 2016 at 8:55 AM
To: Archivesspace Users Group 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Using the Rights sub-records instead 
of Conditions Governing Access/Use notes?

Hi, Jordan,

The Yale ArchivesSpace Committee considered using the rights records before we 
proceeded with developing the machine actionable conditions governing access 
and use note. Here is a link to the topic discussion in the AS Google Group 
list (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/archivesspace/EGdXp7_l-XQ). A 
search on the list might bring up some of the pros and cons. – Best, Mary

From: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Jordon Steele
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 11:19 AM
To: 
'[email protected]<mailto:'[email protected]>'
 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Using the Rights sub-records instead of 
Conditions Governing Access/Use notes?

Hi all,

I know most of the conversation around the Rights sub-records has been limited 
to digital records, but our analysis suggests that conceptually rights 
sub-records are simply more granular, machine-actionable forms of conditions 
governing access and use notes that apply to both analog and digital 
collections. So we’re considering doing away completely with our use of the 
more general conditions governing access and use notes in favor of these more 
precise rights sub-records. Has anyone else considered or done this, or 
considered it and chose not to? Are we missing something?

Thanks!

Best,

Jordon

Jordon Steele
Hodson Curator of the University Archives
The Sheridan Libraries
Johns Hopkins University
3400 N Charles St
Baltimore, MD 21218
410-516-5493
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

_______________________________________________
Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list
[email protected]
http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group

Reply via email to