We are also currently experiencing this issue as well. If I find out more of what our problem is, I’ll send that along later!
Lydia -- Dr. Lydia Tang Special Collections Archivist-Librarian Michigan State University Libraries From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Mang Sun <[email protected]> Reply-To: Archivesspace Users Group <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 1:47 PM To: Archivesspace Users Group <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Indexer erroring in 1.5.2 Steve, You are not alone. We also ran into indexing error when trying to test upgrade v1.5.1 to v.1.5.2 and see no record found again after the test upgrade. LYRASIS Support Desk ever helped us in solving a similar indexing problem (no record found ) which ever drove me mad :) when upgrading 1.4.2 to 1.5.1. I hope there could be more technical document or white paper on the indexing part which could help us do better understanding of the indexing logic and architecture, and consequently could help us do better troubleshooting work. Mang On 1/12/2017 9:42 AM, Majewski, Steven Dennis (sdm7g) wrote: I’m trying to identify the data where it breaks. It looks like it gets the first 275 archival objects in the first repo indexed. But I haven’t yet figured out which one that is or seen anything different in the region where it fails. But I can send you the whole 8MB gzip compressed mysqldump if you want to try to investigate. — Steve. On Jan 11, 2017, at 6:54 PM, James Bullen <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi John and Steve, Can either of you send some sample data that surfaces this bug? Cheers, James On Jan 12, 2017, at 8:17 AM, Majewski, Steven Dennis (sdm7g) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: After seeing this message, I tried 1.5.2 on my Mac (10.11.6) laptop and I’m also seeing the same undefined method `related_records' for nil:NilClass error, whether or not I do an intervening ( and successful, BTW ) update to 1.5.1. Reindexing never seems to progress and so browse resources never shows any records. — Steve Majewski On Jan 11, 2017, at 1:58 PM, Hambleton, John S <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Folks, I am testing archivesspace 1.5.2 on CentOS 6, using a copy of our 1.4.2 production database. Wondering why it seems like the indexer is taking so long to finish, I am seeing this in the archivesspace.out log, which makes me think the indexer is caught in an endless loop: Keep seeing the SAME indexer messages over and over again: ~~~ Indexed 1475 of 1941 accession records in repository 3 ( added 25 records in 8229.0ms ) ~~~ ~~~ Indexed 1500 of 1941 accession records in repository 3 ( added 25 records in 5251.0ms ) ~~~ And then, E, [2017-01-11T13:41:10.740000 #32733] ERROR -- : Thread-6445852: Unhandled exception! E, [2017-01-11T13:41:10.741000 #32733] ERROR -- : undefined method `related_records' for nil:NilClass /usr/local/archivesspace/data/tmp/jetty-0.0.0.0-8089-backend.war-_-any-/webapp/WEB-INF/app/lib/subcontainer_to_aspace_json_mapper.rb:64:in `top_container' /usr/local/archivesspace/data/tmp/jetty-0.0.0.0-8089-backend.war-_-any-/webapp/WEB-INF/app/lib/subcontainer_to_aspace_json_mapper.rb:24:in `type_1' /usr/local/archivesspace/data/tmp/jetty-0.0.0.0-8089-backend.war-_-any-/webapp/WEB-INF/app/lib/subcontainer_to_aspace_json_mapper.rb:14:in `to_hash' org/jruby/RubyHash.java:1341:in `each' And then seems to start indexing the same data over again: ~~~ Indexed 50 of 1941 accession records in repository 3 ( added 25 records in 11153.0ms ) ~~~ ~~~ Indexed 75 of 1941 accession records in repository 3 ( added 25 records in 10051.0ms ) ~~~ ~~~ Indexed 100 of 1941 accession records in repository 3 ( added 25 records in 9558.0ms ) ~~~ Kind of looks like the indexer errors on “something” then, tries to reindex the same accession records over and over again. I had followed the advice here:https://github.com/archivesspace/archivesspace/blob/master/UPGRADING_1.5.0.md#conversion before starting archivesspace, that is, “delete your Solr index files to start with a fresh index”. Any help is appreciated. Thanks, John H NMU _______________________________________________ Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group !DSPAM:5876a103173858981945283! _______________________________________________ Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group !DSPAM:5876a103173858981945283! _______________________________________________ Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group _______________________________________________ Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group _______________________________________________ Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list [email protected] http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group
