Miloche,

Thanks! Although our records do not get converted to MARC, they go into Primo 
along with a bunch of other MARC records, so I want to be mindful of that. 
Thanks for the feedback,

Karen

From: archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org 
<archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org> On Behalf Of Kottman, 
Miloche
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2020 11:16 AM
To: Archivesspace Users Group <archivesspace_users_group@lyralists.lyrasis.org>
Subject: Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Family names as Creators/Subjects

Karen,

We export our records out of ArchivesSpace as MARC and add to OCLC (one more 
place for discovery won’t hurt) so we use NACO for creators and SACO for 
subjects.

This way we have less cleanup to do on the MARC record and it allows patrons 
looking for materials about a family to find all the collections we own with 
that surname and determine on their own if and/or how they are related (i.e. 
they may find connections we missed).

--Miloche

From: 
archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org<mailto:archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org>
 
<archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org<mailto:archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org>>
 On Behalf Of Karen Miller
Sent: Friday, April 3, 2020 4:20 PM
To: Archivesspace Users Group 
<archivesspace_users_group@lyralists.lyrasis.org<mailto:archivesspace_users_group@lyralists.lyrasis.org>>
Subject: Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Family names as Creators/Subjects

Hi, Kate.

NU decided several years ago that these records weren’t  going into OCLC, but 
we NACO catalogers have a hard time disobeying those rules. ☺ They are going 
into our discovery layer (but not through the library catalog, so they never 
pass through a MARC representation) and into ArchiveGrid. Since we can do 
whatever we want in AS, I thought it would be good to do something similar to 
what others are doing in it. It looks like ArchiveGrid has a lot of family 
names formulated in the SACO format (Smith family), so that might be the best 
option. It’s certainly easier than creating the NAF record, especially if we 
don’t actually go to the trouble of creating a SACO proposal!

Karen

From: 
archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org<mailto:archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org>
 
<archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org<mailto:archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org>>
 On Behalf Of Bowers, Kate A.
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2020 2:46 PM
To: Archivesspace Users Group 
<archivesspace_users_group@lyralists.lyrasis.org<mailto:archivesspace_users_group@lyralists.lyrasis.org>>
Subject: Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Family names as Creators/Subjects

RDA is only relevant to the records written in accordance with RDA. You can do 
anything you like in ArchivesSpace.  If the records are exported to a MARC 
environment, the consequences may vary depending on the system. Most MARC 
systems are shared, meaning that other people might  be able to alter the 
record to “correct” it. I’m not sure what OCLC would do with them.

Kate

From: 
archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org<mailto:archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org>
 
<archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org<mailto:archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org>>
 On Behalf Of Karen Miller
Sent: Friday, April 3, 2020 3:38 PM
To: Archivesspace Users Group 
<archivesspace_users_group@lyralists.lyrasis.org<mailto:archivesspace_users_group@lyralists.lyrasis.org>>
Subject: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Family names as Creators/Subjects

Happy Friday, everyone!

I’ve been using my WFH time to do some ArchivesSpace cleanup and have a 
question about how people are using family names. We are a NACO library and 
have been creating personal and corporate body name headings for people and 
organizations represented in our collections. When we have a collection that is 
created by a person or corporate body and also includes biographical or 
historic information about the person or corporate body, we assign the Agent 
record as both Creator and Subject.

This works fine for LC NAF records for people and corporate bodies, but for 
families, we have a dilemma. RDA says that families can be “creators” and 
specifies that they are to be established in a format like this:

            Abdurahman (Family : 1872-1963 : South Africa)

But when a family is the subject, it’s supposed to be established in a format 
like this (the SACO format):

            Abdurahman family

which can refer to any family with the surname Abdurahman, not just the family 
that existed in South Africa from 1872-1963.

I don’t think the SACO format is all that useful, but we used it for a long 
time, before RDA came along. Then when RDA came along, we established some 
family names in the NAF and used them in ArchivesSpace. Now we have family 
names in both formats, which looks a little weird. We only have 13 of them, so 
cleanup isn’t an insurmountable task.

I’ve been considering several options:


1.    Use the NACO format for all family names, including as both Creator or 
Agent. This goes against RDA, but it looks more consistent to the end user and 
I think is provides more information for browsing patrons.

2.    Use the SACO format for all family names, including as both Creator or 
Agent. This also goes against RDA, but it looks more consistent to the end 
user. I think it’s not as useful, though, for people looking for families with 
common names (like Baker instead of Abdurahman)

3.    Use the NACO form for Creator and the SACO form for Subject. It’s 
inconsistent, but follows RDA. Since these aren’t BIBCO records, it’s not as if 
this is a mortal sin!

I’m sure there are more options, but I think I’ve gone on enough here. What are 
other institutions doing?

Karen


Karen D. Miller
Monographic Cataloger/Metadata Specialist
Northwestern University Libraries
Northwestern University
1970 Campus Drive
Evanston, IL 60208
www.library.northwestern.edu<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http*3A*2F*2Fwww.library.northwestern.edu*2F&data=02*7C01*7Cmkottman*40ku.edu*7C34df388b9a7f428222f908d7d814d2d5*7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a*7C0*7C1*7C637215456279983454&sdata=yGT2XffWAIvf8gsO*2BPGObJurzZ7y1s46Yts*2BwwRW2w4*3D&reserved=0__;JSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUl!!Dq0X2DkFhyF93HkjWTBQKhk!BgO7_9jgl07VaHq7EVgwGpDbIcypFpP_mqUQ09WvBjXavVMcl1MVpxQQyZmmwiSYBPMRJb5N$>
k-mill...@northwestern.edu<mailto:k-mill...@northwestern.edu>
874.467.3462


_______________________________________________
Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list
Archivesspace_Users_Group@lyralists.lyrasis.org
http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group

Reply via email to