Option A, because anything but a URI would create invalid EAD if exported or requested via OAI-PMH.

Andrew.


On 19/04/2021 17:41, Majewski, Steven Dennis (sdm7g) wrote:

I would think ‘A’, but that’s based on that the field is labeled “File URI” so I expect something that looks like a URI, and the fact that some notes in ArchivesSpace are explicitly labeled as allowing mixed content, and that has made me assume that allowing mixed content is not the default. But I guess that would not rule out ‘C’ as the original intention.

(Sometimes, if I assume something long enough, it turns into a rule in my head!)

I would also note that where mixed content is allowed, it doesn’t appear to be validated, and I’m seeing a lot of examples in the wild of invalid EAD exported with missing end tags, undeclared namespaces and other issues that prevent parsing EAD exported from ArchivesSpace. We probably should add a validation step where mixed content is allowed to attempt to parse the note as an XML fragment, and not accept the edit if it fails. ( I’ve been meaning to get around to testing this to see if there are any side effects or spurious rejections from doing this. )

— Steve.

On Apr 19, 2021, at 11:50 AM, Brian Hoffman <brian.hoff...@lyrasis.org <mailto:brian.hoff...@lyrasis.org>> wrote:

Hi,
We have been trying to understand what to do about cases like the following: http://sandbox.archivesspace.org/digital_objects/2/edit#tree::digital_object_2 <http://sandbox.archivesspace.org/digital_objects/2/edit#tree::digital_object_2>
<image001.png>
As things are now, ArchivesSpace will allow a value like this, but various renderings and transformations will not work as expected. I am wondering if:

 1. This is a legacy bug; the field should have originally validated
    values to ensure they were URIs
 2. This is a presentation layer bug: non URIs should be allowed in
    the file_uri field, but HTML and PDF presentations need to
    accommodate that.
 3. Everything is fine. Users should be able to put whatever they
    want in file_uri, but if they want it to present right they need
    to write a plugin.

This isn’t an academic question, as this is currently happening with records created automatically by Preservica software.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list
Archivesspace_Users_Group@lyralists.lyrasis.org <mailto:Archivesspace_Users_Group@lyralists.lyrasis.org> http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group <http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group>


_______________________________________________
Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list
Archivesspace_Users_Group@lyralists.lyrasis.org
http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group
_______________________________________________
Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list
Archivesspace_Users_Group@lyralists.lyrasis.org
http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group

Reply via email to