Can you explain the case for open-ended dates for resources, accessions, archival, or digital objects?
From: archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org <archivesspace_users_group-boun...@lyralists.lyrasis.org> On Behalf Of Ron Van den Branden Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2022 10:32 AM To: archivesspace_users_group@lyralists.lyrasis.org Subject: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] how to encode open-ended date ranges? Hi, We’re in the process of migrating data to ArchivesSpace, and one thing I’m still struggling with is how to encode open-ended date ranges, using standardized dates only. In other words: how to express: * the fact that only a start date is known * or the fact that only an end date is known …while still indicating this known date is the start / end of a range whose other end is not known; as opposite to expressing a precise singular/punctual date. Given the fact that ArchivesSpace currently uses 2 distinct date models for accessions, resources/archival objects and digital objects vs agents (see https://www.mail-archive.com/archivesspace_users_group@lyralists.lyrasis.org/msg05341.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.mail-2Darchive.com_archivesspace-5Fusers-5Fgroup-40lyralists.lyrasis.org_msg05341.html&d=DwMGaQ&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=wwc_Z_TbmWbPFh7My2zRxmrGgCNO-71Fwzlmd8YZVUY&m=hwhUWCl8DmiVBAr8KCWWuvqIpF5qGU38NpEyKdpmIIC_b1sDZ08xKIYeni9Jn1Sz&s=cH9UvNvbKkbEcG88o6pqGcf3-0l_7L5sIV0c3bplsR8&e=>), I’ll outline the observations and options I’m seeing. [1] Accessions, resources, archival objects, digital objects: * “Single” date only offers a single date field, labeled “Begin” * “Inclusive” date offers both a “Begin” and “End” date field, only one of which is required Would this be a good strategy: * “singular/punctual” dates: “single” date, one value as “Begin” date * date range: “inclusive” date, start and end dates as “Begin” and “End” dates, respectively * open-ended date range: “inclusive” date, with known date as either “Begin” or “End” date ? This leads me to the question whether in practice “single” dates are used at all for anything except accession dates, creation dates of digital objects, or as dates for only the lowest-level archival objects? [2] Agents: * “Single” date only offers a single date field, which can be labeled as either “Begin” or “End” * “Inclusive” date offers both a “Begin” and “End” date field, of which “Begin” is mandatory Would this be a good strategy: * “singular/punctual” dates: “single” date, one value as either “Begin” or “End” date Note: in EAC output, the begin/end qualification is dismissed: both are exported without distinction as e.g. <date localType="existence" standardDate="2022-10-08">2022-10-08</date> * date range: “inclusive” date, start and end dates as “Begin” and “End” dates, respectively * open-ended date range: ? ==> problem if only end date is known, since begin date is mandatory In other words: how would one differentiate between, e.g.: * birth date of a living person (1990 - ) * birth date of a deceased person, whose death date is unknown (1800 - ?) * death date of a person whose birth date is unknown (? - 1950) ? The documentation in the ArchivesSpace Help Center merely documents the different fields, but I couldn’t find much guidance on how to use them in practice. The DACS, EAD, and EAC documentation is rather sparse as well regarding open-ended date ranges. Therefore, any guidance on this matter would be much appreciated! Best, Ron Ron Van den Branden | functioneel analist - applicatiebeheerder Letterenhuis Stad Antwerpen | Talentontwikkeling en Vrijetijdsbeleving | Musea en Erfgoed Minderbroedersstraat 22, 2000 Antwerpen ✉ Grote Markt 1, 2000 Antwerpen gsm +32 0485 02 80 50 | tel. +32 3 222 93 30 letterenhuis.be<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.letterenhuis.be_&d=DwMGaQ&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=wwc_Z_TbmWbPFh7My2zRxmrGgCNO-71Fwzlmd8YZVUY&m=hwhUWCl8DmiVBAr8KCWWuvqIpF5qGU38NpEyKdpmIIC_b1sDZ08xKIYeni9Jn1Sz&s=RCdANiyeGbpOaHKErHK7dN3hVi4Xjiqw7EG9JmMGEIM&e=> | instagram<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.instagram.com_letterenhuis_&d=DwMGaQ&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=wwc_Z_TbmWbPFh7My2zRxmrGgCNO-71Fwzlmd8YZVUY&m=hwhUWCl8DmiVBAr8KCWWuvqIpF5qGU38NpEyKdpmIIC_b1sDZ08xKIYeni9Jn1Sz&s=23CBQ1OTniE_zIpk904UheXNdpIsl_Gs62ZkcZgRQN4&e=> | facebook<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.facebook.com_Letterenhuis&d=DwMGaQ&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=wwc_Z_TbmWbPFh7My2zRxmrGgCNO-71Fwzlmd8YZVUY&m=hwhUWCl8DmiVBAr8KCWWuvqIpF5qGU38NpEyKdpmIIC_b1sDZ08xKIYeni9Jn1Sz&s=Vas9PGIxYEolJnQuVo9qEE1hue_eztFb4vZEFEOLCUE&e=> Proclaimer Vergissen is menselijk. Dus als deze e-mail, samen met eventuele bijlagen, niet voor u bestemd is, vragen we u vriendelijk om dat te melden aan de afzender. Deze e-mail en de bijlagen zijn namelijk officiële documenten van de stad Antwerpen. Ze kunnen vertrouwelijke of persoonlijke informatie bevatten. Als stad nemen we privacy heel serieus en willen we als een goede huisvader waken over de vertrouwelijkheid van documenten. Als u dit bericht per vergissing hebt ontvangen of ergens hebt gevonden, wees dan zo eerlijk om het meteen te verwijderen en het niet verder te verspreiden of te kopiëren.
_______________________________________________ Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list Archivesspace_Users_Group@lyralists.lyrasis.org http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group
