I blame the gnomes ;-) (I would blame the gremlins, but they get enough bad press) indeed, that one is supposed to be present too.
When considering trunk/* worth also considering the 2 bits of fn mentioned in the readme that the gnomes have run off with. The rfc66 related fn, and the application.mf processing api. I like the maven bits I've seen so far of blueprint, I have little familiarity with maven, but it integrated fairly well with eclipse, tho I did have a few problems with it not letting me see the exports (declared as configuration on the bundle?) from within the eclipse plugin managing pom.xml, that's likely just an issue with the plugin. Regards Ozzy On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: > com.ibm.ws.eba.app.utils seems to have not been include too, but is > mentioned in the README ... > > 2009/10/1 Valentin Mahrwald <[email protected]>: > > Hi Jeremy, > > > > what happened to the com.ibm.osgi.web bundle that is referenced in the > README but does not seem to be in the svn folder? > > > > Regards, > > > > Valentin > > > > On 1 Oct 2009, at 18:21, Jeremy Hughes wrote: > > > >> Hi, I have just committed r820722 - the initial contribution from IBM > >> [1]. There is a readme [2]. The next step is to discuss & move over to > >> the trunk. The Software Grant Agreement has been sent to [email protected] > >> > >> [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/aries/contrib/ibm > >> [2] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/aries/contrib/ibm/README > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Jeremy > > > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com >
