I've never seen a deprecated interface subsequently become undeprecated.
Maybe we could mark the version 1.0-RC1?
Just an idea.
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 26, 2010, at 9:59 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I'd love to see a release of aries-blueprint in particular. I
wonder if it would be a good idea to mark "deprecated" some of the
interfaces such as NamespaceHandler that aren't yet in a spec and
might change but will be used by lots of people? On the other hand
geronimo-blueprint got released without such markings.
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 26, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
There's been a lot of activity lately so I'd like to propose we do a
release so we can get some wider user feedback. I think we should
give
it a version of 0.1 and stick to versions <1 while we're in the
Incubator.
Then there is the question of whether to independently version the
high level modules or keep them lock-step. For now I think we should
keep them lock-step until we feel a need to change that.
What does everyone think?
Thanks,
Jeremy
