Looks very interesting, any idea when it'll be in a release :) Alasdair
On 19 February 2010 15:08, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: > Forwarding here as it may interesting for you. > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> > Date: Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 15:56 > Subject: [Heads up][OBR] Stax based parser > To: dev <[email protected]> > > > I've just committed a new stax based parser into the OBR service. It > will be used automatically if possible (meaning if the > javax.xml.stream package is available) else the default one will be > used. I've seen a parsing time divided by 10 on my computer. To test > it a bit, you can uncomment the StaxParserTest#testPerfs method and > run it from maven using > mvn test -Dtest=StaxParserTest > It will run a loop and parse your ~/.m2/repository/repository.xml file. > > The results on my computer are the following: > > Running org.apache.felix.bundlerepository.StaxParserTest > Woodstox: 5924 ms > DefStax: 7154 ms > KXmlParser: 55368 ms > Woodstox: 4583 ms > DefStax: 5374 ms > KXmlParser: 51820 ms > ... > > The first run of test is longer because you need to let the JIT warm up. > But this shows that when using the default stax parser (from the JRE), > the parsing time is down to 10.3 % and down to 8.9 % when using > Woodstox ! > > The parsing is entirely new, so please take some time to test it with > your real use cases and make sure i haven't forgotten anything in the > parser. > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com > -- Alasdair Nottingham [email protected]
