Based on the response on legal-discuss I'm cancelling this vote and building a new release candidate.
Thanks for your votes so far and patience ! Jeremy On 28 April 2010 15:22, Jeremy Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: > I've raised it on legal-discuss. Has the following option been > considered to satisfy the "... and include the License file at > glassfish/bootstrap/legal/LICENSE.txt.": > > Include that LICENSE.txt file separately from the project's LICENSE > file in a directory called glassfish/bootstrap/legal directory within > the jar/zip AND include the CDDL only in the project's LICENSE file > located at the root of the zip. > > Cheers, > Jeremy > > On 28 April 2010 14:41, Donald Woods <[email protected]> wrote: >> Yep, after recent discussions about this on the Geronimo lists, we'll be >> updating the text in the OpenJPA licenses for our next set of release >> artifacts. >> >> -Donald >> >> >> On 4/27/10 5:43 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote: >>> On 27 April 2010 15:51, Kevan Miller <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Apr 27, 2010, at 9:44 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 27 April 2010 14:42, Kevan Miller <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Jeremy, >>>>>> I realized that I failed to review a few things. Can you give me a few >>>>>> hours? >>>>> >>>>> sure, I was hoping to get 3 IPMC binding +1s before calling the vote. >>>>> We have 2 - Guillaume and you at the moment and Dims has just told me >>>>> he'll ping me back later today. >>>> >>>> So reviewing a Geronimo release (which had this same issue) made me come >>>> back and take a look at Aries. >>>> >>>> For dual license files like: >>>> jpa-0.1-incubating/jpa-container/src/main/resources/org/apache/aries/jpa/container/parsing/impl/persistence.xsd.rsrc >>>> >>>> I believe we should be including both licenses (as explained in the header >>>> of the files). We are currently only including the CDDL license (this may >>>> have been my mistake -- in saying the LICENSE information in the RC1 jar >>>> file was correct...). I think we should be including the full license text >>>> from https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/CDDL+GPL.html (i.e. both >>>> licenses), then choosing the CDDL license in the NOTICE file. >>>> >>>> If we were only including the CDDL license in the RC1 jar file, then I >>>> should have caught this last time... Apologies. >>>> >>>> If others agree, afraid we'll need to update... >>> >>> Is there a precedent for this? The recent 2.0.0 OpenJPA binary and >>> source zip have a LICENSE.txt with just the CDDL in it, no GPL license >>> text. Has this been discussed on a list somewhere - I couldn't see >>> anything recently on legal-discuss@ - it seems there is some >>> inconsistency. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Jeremy >>> >>>> >>>> --kevan >>> >> >
