Indeed. It turns out the JMX itests reuse the blueprint.sample project and make 
their assertions about what it contains :(

I have checked in a fix for it in the 0.3 stream under 990185.

Apologies.

Valentin

On 27 Aug 2010, at 16:19, Joe Bohn wrote:

> Unfortunately, I'm now hitting a build failure for one of the tests in jmx - 
> I suspect due to the changes in blueprint:
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Test set: org.apache.aries.jmx.test.blueprint.BlueprintMBeanTest
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 4.891 sec <<< 
> FAILURE!
> BlueprintSample 
> [equinox](org.apache.aries.jmx.test.blueprint.BlueprintMBeanTest)  Time 
> elapsed: 4.84 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: There should be only one service component in this 
> sample expected:<1> but was:<2>
>       at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:74)
>       at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:448)
>       at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:102)
>       at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:323)
>       at 
> org.apache.aries.jmx.test.blueprint.BlueprintMBeanTest.BlueprintSample(BlueprintMBeanTest.java:181)
>       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>       at 
> org.ops4j.pax.exam.junit.extender.impl.internal.CallableTestMethodImpl.injectContextAndInvoke(CallableTestMethodImpl.java:134)
>       at 
> org.ops4j.pax.exam.junit.extender.impl.internal.CallableTestMethodImpl.call(CallableTestMethodImpl.java:101)
>       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>       at 
> org.ops4j.pax.exam.rbc.internal.RemoteBundleContextImpl.remoteCall(RemoteBundleContextImpl.java:80)
>       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>       at sun.rmi.server.UnicastServerRef.dispatch(UnicastServerRef.java:305)
>       at sun.rmi.transport.Transport$1.run(Transport.java:159)
>       at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
>       at sun.rmi.transport.Transport.serviceCall(Transport.java:155)
>       at 
> sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport.handleMessages(TCPTransport.java:535)
>       at 
> sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.run0(TCPTransport.java:790)
>       at 
> sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.run(TCPTransport.java:649)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
>       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:637)
> 
> 
> 
> On 8/27/10 9:35 AM, zoe slattery wrote:
>> Starting discussion thread for RC04.
>> 
>> The only difference between this candidate and the last (RC03) is a
>> change to fix a deadlock
>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-390) and another small
>> change to fix a CT failure
>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-387).
>> 
>> Zoƫ
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Joe

Reply via email to