I don't really see the semantic difference between common and util but it maybe because i'm not a native english ...
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:03, Jeremy Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: > On 26 October 2010 10:30, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: >> Itsn't the util project a good location for that ? > > As long, IMHO, as we use submodules with sensible names. Util could > turn into a dumping ground otherwise. If the util modules is turning > into a 'commons' then shouldn't we just call it commons as is the way > with other Apache projects, and then people coming to the project will > know we're trying to fit into the 'commons' pattern. > >> >> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:24, Jeremy Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 25 October 2010 22:39, Alasdair Nottingham <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> It appears that we have multiple classes which basically create a >>>> ClassLoader that delegates to a Bundle. Ones I know of are: >>>> >>>> /blueprint/blueprint-core/src/main/java/org/apache/aries/blueprint/utils/BundleDelegatingClassLoader.java >>>> /util/src/main/java/org/apache/aries/util/BundleToClassLoaderAdapter.java >>>> /jpa/jpa-container/src/main/java/org/apache/aries/jpa/container/unit/impl/BundleDelegatingClassLoader.java >>>> >>>> There may be others. I was wondering if it would make sense to try to >>>> common these up into one place? >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>> >>> Good idea. I was wondering where you might put this. Since you use the >>> word 'common' I think an 'aries commons' module would be a good place >>> to put this. Something like trunk/commons/cl ? >>> >>>> Alasdair >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Alasdair Nottingham >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> ------------------------ >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> ------------------------ >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com >> > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
