On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Alasdair Nottingham <[email protected]> wrote: > > I was specifically referring to your comment about one form making more sense > than another. I was pointing out that which is simpler or clearer and depends > on what you think jpa:context means. I was not commenting on the relative > validity of the two XML snippets. >
Ok. To me the question is, what fits better or is more natural from Blueprint POV? The syntax I described fits much better with Blueprint, it's consistent, flexible, etc. Even one of the jpa blueprint users had the right idea in ARIES-413. The argument and property bean injection is well defined in the blueprint spec and we shouldn't invent our own ways of doing the same. The current namespace handler just does too much and if we switch to the new syntax the code and schema will be simpler and we will have greater flexibility. Jarek
