... are you from the ISOC when using IPv6? please post your results too :)
$ sudo traceroute 2001:7f8:3b::2 traceroute to 2001:7f8:3b::2 (2001:7f8:3b::2), 30 hops max, 80 byte packets 1 2a02:ed0:5d:f00:50:43ff:fe71:6f3e (2a02:ed0:5d:f00:50:43ff:fe71:6f3e) 0.267 ms 0.601 ms 0.583 ms 2 ar01.lo1.v6.018.net.il (2a02:ed0:3800::1:3) 21.094 ms 21.080 ms 21.850 ms 3 mx-b.vl10.v6.018.net.il (2a02:ed0:3800:4::7) 19.770 ms 19.781 ms 20.138 ms 4 2001:7f8:3b:8::1 (2001:7f8:3b:8::1) 19.267 ms 19.664 ms 20.030 ms 5 2001:7f8:3b::2 (2001:7f8:3b::2) 20.412 ms 20.408 ms 20.396 ms Reading this: http://ipv6-test.com/stats/country/IL It seems like 013 netvision and hotnet also started offering native IPv6 (or maybe the few hits on ipv6-test.com can be explained by hot admins doing tests in preparation to do so). Anyway, it's worth asking. If you are with 013 netvision or hot (or any other ISP -- just that then the answer is most likely "no"), ask your ISP for native IPv6 connectivity. In my experience, it's worth it even just for the extra bandwidth -- the IPv6 backbone usually is much less congested (but might still have a bad day every once in a while)... _______________________________________________ arig-discuss mailing list arig-discuss@lists.subsignal.org https://lists.subsignal.org/mailman/listinfo/arig-discuss