found another one, 70nis for a 35X27X15 cm with clear cover
at
זרם סטרלץ, מכשירי חשמל לתעשייה, ציוד חשמל לתעשייה, בהעליה 41 תל אביב


On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Yair Reshef <yai...@gmail.com> wrote:

> of course, this is standard electrical grade boxes used all over. i have
> one on my roof for 6 years and it didnt show any coloration.  also labeld
> as fire resistant up to 850deg (?!)
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Yuval Adam <yuv....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> are those UV resistant? important factor if they are mounted on a tel
>> aviv roof.
>> also need to be able to drill rain-proof ventilation holes to make sure
>> shit doesn't get to hot.
>>
>> On Tuesday, February 11, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Yair Reshef wrote:
>>
>>  ok, sorry for the delay.
>> i did some outdoor weather proof box survey.
>> i think NISCO boxes are the standard in israel, most of the stores carry
>> them and can get specific models. but they go up to 20cm (for around 42nis)
>> http://i.imgur.com/t8N8Z4G.jpg
>>
>>
>> ולנציק - רחוב אלנבי 123
>> carry this nice one, i didnt catch the maker, but its popular in other
>> stores as well. a bit bigger with 23cm width and around 15cm deep. for
>> 65nis or 60nis for non clear version.
>> http://i.imgur.com/O84dtfP.jpg
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Amir Sagie 
>> <arig-disc...@taproot.org.il>wrote:
>>
>> Hey Yaval, valuable post, let me add my take on this -
>>
>> > What I'm trying to point to is an actual demand from people to
>> > actively participate in such a network (with obvious varying levels of
>> > technical aptitude.)
>> >
>> > With that in mind, I can't help but feel we're slightly off-track with
>> > our current efforts.  Most of the active Arig participants (myself
>> > included) come from a strong technical background, and thus making it
>> > natural to navigate our activity towards hard technical discussions
>> > and development.  All the while, it feels (to me, at least) that we
>> > need to be putting more effort into deploying actual technology on the
>> > ground - even if it is out-of-the-box and rough around the edges -
>> > such that we are in touch with people who are interested in
>> > participating in the network, but lack the knowledge or motivation to
>> > enter the core technical discussions.  It might be that case that in
>> > the end of day, we'll have more participation and more motivation to
>> > continue the development we want to see, but at a faster pace.
>>
>> I can see your point and fully agree - there are people out there who
>> could use the technology *today*, and we should focus on reaching them.
>> So why is this process taking so long? well, consider
>> the problem at hand - maximizing impact, given our current resource pool
>> (think people,hardware,know-how) and the available task surface
>> (fund-raising, coding, on-the-ground work, etc.) - tough one right? even
>> more considering what you've mentioned, with different views on which are
>> the lowest hanging fruit, interpretation of impact, the time-scale we
>> measure things by etc. Then consider unexpected things like Beit-Hair...
>>
>> So, what's the way forward? I think borrowing from TAMI mentality makes
>> the most sense - people with available time simply DO. I don't see any
>> effort being lost in the near future in this mode of operation, at least
>> until we get more hands involved.
>>
>> One thing I can point to which seems to have worked out nicely for
>> guifi.net in terms of on-the-ground presence is a fund-the-next-node
>> wiki widget - the basic idea is simple: we always have a plan in hand
>> for the next node we'd like to deploy - role, hw, location and all. Then
>> we get a real-world price estimate for it, and slowly move towards that
>> goal with a nice front-page wiki progress bar. I think this can gain
>> momentum after a few successful nodes are born this way... anyway that's
>> one of my current top TODOs.
>>
>> > Personally, I am gearing myself towards more on-the-ground activity in
>> > the south TLV area (Jaffa, Florentin, Shapira) where there is lots of
>> > interest in Arig and actual deployment of nodes with high probability
>> > of physical connections.
>> >
>> > I believe that this is what we should be focusing on in the near
>> > future, in order for Arig to successfully bootstrap.
>>
>> That would be awsome. If you can manage to deploy some nodes using AIB,
>> that would be cool, and even better would be upstream'ing image
>> configuration patches.
>>
>> > Please let me know if you feel the same or if I'm tx'ing on a
>> > completely different channel :)
>>
>> Not at all - personally I was stalling in hope to post back to this
>> thread with good news about a couple of Mikrotik routerboard 433AH
>> boards heading our way, alas the auction gods were not on my side ;]
>>
>> To end on a positive note, I'm adding a picture for what may be the
>> first? 2014 node - it's a laptop based rig, dual miniPCIe, aimed towards
>> hosting virtual nodes for firmware testing & automatic firmware
>> upgrading, without undermining the stability of the core system. There's
>> still much room for tuning such rigs in terms of power consumption, but
>> with proper BIOS settings and down-scaling CPU freq. I'm optimistic.
>> With, *ahem* Yair's approval, I hope to deploy a similar rig at his
>> place soon.
>>
>> Keep up the good work, and happy hacking!
>> Amir
>>
>> > Cheers,
>> > - Yuval
>> >
>>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > arig-discuss mailing list
>> > arig-discuss@lists.subsignal.org
>> > https://lists.subsignal.org/mailman/listinfo/arig-discuss
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> arig-discuss mailing list
>> arig-discuss@lists.subsignal.org
>> https://lists.subsignal.org/mailman/listinfo/arig-discuss
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> yair99@gmail
>> 050-6301212
>> tlv, israel
>>  _______________________________________________
>> arig-discuss mailing list
>> arig-discuss@lists.subsignal.org
>> https://lists.subsignal.org/mailman/listinfo/arig-discuss
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> arig-discuss mailing list
>> arig-discuss@lists.subsignal.org
>> https://lists.subsignal.org/mailman/listinfo/arig-discuss
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> yair99@gmail
> 050-6301212
> tlv, israel
>



-- 
yair99@gmail
050-6301212
tlv, israel
_______________________________________________
arig-discuss mailing list
arig-discuss@lists.subsignal.org
https://lists.subsignal.org/mailman/listinfo/arig-discuss

Reply via email to