Send ARIN-consult mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-consult
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of ARIN-consult digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. FW: Consultation on Implementing Term Limits for the ARIN
      Board of Trustees (ARIN)
   2. FW: Consultation on Implementing Term Limits for the ARIN
      Board of Trustees (ARIN)
   3. Re: FW: Consultation on Implementing Term Limits for the ARIN
      Board of Trustees (William Herrin)
   4. Re: FW: Consultation on Implementing Term Limits for the ARIN
      Board of Trustees (Adam Thompson)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 16:31:58 -0500
From: ARIN <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: [ARIN-consult] FW: Consultation on Implementing Term Limits
        for the ARIN Board of Trustees
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Returning misdirected mail to the discussion thread.

 

 

From: John Curran <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, December 1, 2021 at 2:10 PM
To: John Comfort <[email protected]>
Cc: ARIN <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [ARIN-consult] Consultation on Implementing Term Limits for the 
ARIN Board of Trustees

 

On 1 Dec 2021, at 1:51 PM, John Comfort via ARIN-consult 
<[email protected]> wrote:

 

From: John Comfort <[email protected]>

Subject: Re: [ARIN-consult] Consultation on Implementing Term Limits for the 
ARIN Board of Trustees

Date: 1 December 2021 at 1:51:54 PM EST

To: ARIN <[email protected]>

Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>

 

Is this merely a rehash of the "Consultation on Increasing the size of the ARIN 
Board of Trustees" discussion on implementing politicized "Diversity"?

 

Is the Board unanimous on this issue? If not, what are the dissenting opinions?

 

Who is the independent consultant/consulting agency ARIN hired for this 
endeavor?  What were their objectives specifically?

 

John -

The consultation that is now underway is specifically regarding the 
implementation of Term Limits for the ARIN Board of Trustees. At present, the 
Board has reviewed the proposal to add term limits and approved having a 
consultation with the community oil this topic so as to gather community input 
? as this will help inform the Board of Trustees with their future 
consideration of the proposed change and potential adoption. 

 

The firm hired to conduct the overall ARIN governance review was Baker Tilly 
and the review centered on best practices in not-for-profit governance and 
ARIN?s existing practices.  Baker Tilly was selected as a result of a 
competitive process whereby ARIN issued an RFP and five responses were received 
that were deemed competitive and of high quality (as noted in the Board minutes 
for 29 July 2020 https://www.arin.net/about/welcome/board/meetings/2020_0729/)

 

I hope this information help in your consideration of the proposed change to 
implement Term Limits for the ARIN Board of Trustees.  If you have specific 
views that you can share in support or in opposition of the proposed change to 
add term limits as detailed in the consultation, that would be most excellent.

 

Thanks!

/John

 

John Curran

President and CEO

American Registry for Internet Numbers

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/attachments/20211201/4a684c46/attachment-0001.htm>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 16:32:54 -0500
From: ARIN <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: [ARIN-consult] FW: Consultation on Implementing Term Limits
        for the ARIN Board of Trustees
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Returning misdirected mail to the discussion thread.

 

 

From: John Comfort <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, December 1, 2021 at 2:38 PM
To: John Curran <[email protected]>
Cc: ARIN <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [ARIN-consult] Consultation on Implementing Term Limits for the 
ARIN Board of Trustees

 

Thank you Mr Curran.  Mr Woodfield, the issue is that politicized Diversity 
makes paramount the color of skin, sex and sexual orientation, etc. to 
determine who is appointed.  I am advocating that it ought to be only merit, 
experience and ability that determine eligibility of candidates.  I'd hate to 
see yet another decent American institution fall down to politics.

 

On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 11:10 AM John Curran <[email protected]> wrote:

On 1 Dec 2021, at 1:51 PM, John Comfort via ARIN-consult 
<[email protected]> wrote:

 

From: John Comfort <[email protected]>

Subject: Re: [ARIN-consult] Consultation on Implementing Term Limits for the 
ARIN Board of Trustees

Date: 1 December 2021 at 1:51:54 PM EST

To: ARIN <[email protected]>

Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>

 

Is this merely a rehash of the "Consultation on Increasing the size of the ARIN 
Board of Trustees" discussion on implementing politicized "Diversity"?

 

Is the Board unanimous on this issue? If not, what are the dissenting opinions?

 

Who is the independent consultant/consulting agency ARIN hired for this 
endeavor?  What were their objectives specifically?

 

John -

The consultation that is now underway is specifically regarding the 
implementation of Term Limits for the ARIN Board of Trustees. At present, the 
Board has reviewed the proposal to add term limits and approved having a 
consultation with the community oil this topic so as to gather community input 
? as this will help inform the Board of Trustees with their future 
consideration of the proposed change and potential adoption. 

 

The firm hired to conduct the overall ARIN governance review was Baker Tilly 
and the review centered on best practices in not-for-profit governance and 
ARIN?s existing practices.  Baker Tilly was selected as a result of a 
competitive process whereby ARIN issued an RFP and five responses were received 
that were deemed competitive and of high quality (as noted in the Board minutes 
for 29 July 2020 https://www.arin.net/about/welcome/board/meetings/2020_0729/)

 

I hope this information help in your consideration of the proposed change to 
implement Term Limits for the ARIN Board of Trustees.  If you have specific 
views that you can share in support or in opposition of the proposed change to 
add term limits as detailed in the consultation, that would be most excellent.

 

Thanks!

/John

 

John Curran

President and CEO

American Registry for Internet Numbers

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/attachments/20211201/bd34e928/attachment-0001.htm>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 17:17:37 -0800
From: William Herrin <[email protected]>
Cc: "<[email protected]>" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [ARIN-consult] FW: Consultation on Implementing Term
        Limits for the ARIN Board of Trustees
Message-ID:
        <cap-gugv7gc+8wzeosqnbqevffynwp9+js+df90gktelvb5s...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

> From: Chris Woodfield <[email protected]>
>
> I?m curious on your thoughts as to why efforts to create a more
> diverse governorship body for ARIN is a bad thing for ARIN
> and/or the community. Care to explain how this would negatively
> impact the community?

Hi Chris,

The way I see it, the board's most critical role is to keep ARIN
on-mission. To serve that mission I want to see people who are first
and foremost network engineers, experts at routing and IP address
management.

While there is a degree of diversity within that specialization, I
would not want to see those folks' vote diluted by individuals whose
core competency was, for example, finance. Nor would I want to select
less than the best possible individuals for the sake of catering to
localities, genders, etc. That could only distract from ARIN's core
mission to be one of the authoritative registries of IP addresses in
use on the Internet.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William Herrin
[email protected]
https://bill.herrin.us/


------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 01:24:22 +0000
From: Adam Thompson <[email protected]>
To: William Herrin <[email protected]>
Cc: "<[email protected]>" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [ARIN-consult] FW: Consultation on Implementing Term
        Limits for the ARIN Board of Trustees
Message-ID:
        
<yt2pr01mb462261e137e2c1adf54c93f9ab...@yt2pr01mb4622.canprd01.prod.outlook.com>
        
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Bill, my understanding (well, more along the lines of "received knowledge", 
tbh) is that the current board does include some people with technical 
knowledge connected to the internet, but zero or nearly-zero persons with 
(recent) operational experience in operating a network.  I have not personally 
verified this information - no insult is intended here!

If that is indeed the case, then diversifying the board would imply getting a 
network operator ONTO the board.

FWIW, my preference would be to put language somewhere along the lines of 
"...the nomination committee shall, wherever and whenever feasible, ensure a 
minimum of one (1) person(s) with recent network operational experience stands 
for election every time".  (That's not well-worded, but it I think it sorta 
captures what I mean.)

-Adam Thompson


-----Original Message-----
From: ARIN-consult <[email protected]> On Behalf Of William Herrin
Sent: Wednesday, December 1, 2021 7:18 PM
Cc: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [ARIN-consult] FW: Consultation on Implementing Term Limits for 
the ARIN Board of Trustees

> From: Chris Woodfield <[email protected]>
>
> I?m curious on your thoughts as to why efforts to create a more 
> diverse governorship body for ARIN is a bad thing for ARIN and/or the 
> community. Care to explain how this would negatively impact the 
> community?

Hi Chris,

The way I see it, the board's most critical role is to keep ARIN on-mission. To 
serve that mission I want to see people who are first and foremost network 
engineers, experts at routing and IP address management.

While there is a degree of diversity within that specialization, I would not 
want to see those folks' vote diluted by individuals whose core competency was, 
for example, finance. Nor would I want to select less than the best possible 
individuals for the sake of catering to localities, genders, etc. That could 
only distract from ARIN's core mission to be one of the authoritative 
registries of IP addresses in use on the Internet.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


--
William Herrin
[email protected]
https://bill.herrin.us/
_______________________________________________
ARIN-Consult
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Consult 
Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-consult Please contact the ARIN 
Member Services Help Desk at [email protected] if you experience any issues.

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
ARIN-consult mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-consult


------------------------------

End of ARIN-consult Digest, Vol 86, Issue 3
*******************************************

Reply via email to