Send ARIN-consult mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-consult
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of ARIN-consult digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Consultation on Implementing Single Transferrable Voting
      for ARIN Elections (John Curran)
   2. Re: Consultation on Implementing Single Transferrable Voting
      for ARIN Elections (Adam Thompson)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 18:05:37 +0000
From: John Curran <[email protected]>
To: Adam Thompson <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [ARIN-consult] Consultation on Implementing Single
        Transferrable Voting for ARIN Elections
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Adam -

Yes, one could consider it a bug or a feature, depending on perspective.   It 
is, however, not the question being asked of the consultation, which rather 
seeks to ask ?Should the ARIN Board of Trustees be able to specify use of the 
non-plurality model of STV for ARIN elections, including necessary changes to 
the Articles and Bylaws to allow that??

(I have no objection to more specific constraints on ARIN election processes in 
the Bylaws, but would suggest that such be done only to enshrine a successful 
approach that?s been proven after several years of operating experience...)

Thanks,
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
American Registry for Internet Numbers

On 7 Jan 2022, at 9:55 AM, Adam Thompson 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

I get your point? but that?s a bug, not a feature.  What you?ve described below 
is precisely the problem we?re now noticing, or becoming aware of.
-Adam

Adam Thompson
Consultant, Infrastructure Services
<image001.png>
100 - 135 Innovation Drive
Winnipeg, MB, R3T 6A8
(204) 977-6824 or 1-800-430-6404 (MB only)
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
www.merlin.mb.ca<http://www.merlin.mb.ca/>

From: ARIN-consult 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf 
Of John Curran
Sent: Friday, January 7, 2022 11:38 AM
To: Owen DeLong <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [ARIN-consult] Consultation on Implementing Single Transferrable 
Voting for ARIN Elections

On 7 Jan 2022, at 9:15 AM, Owen DeLong 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
...
Currently, the membership is able to have faith that the board will not 
unilaterally move away from majority election of directors because
Virginia law forbids it without a change to the articles of incorporation that 
they would have to approve.

The blanket language proposed in the current change, however, would allow the 
board to adopt any process it so chooses at any
time without being subject to review of the membership.

I think many, myself included, would like to see some level of check and 
balance requiring membership and/or community involvement
and consideration in changing the election process(es) rather than writing a 
blank check for the board to do whatever it likes in this
regard.

Owen -

For clarity, I?d like to address the question you raise about Board latitude in 
ARIN election processes, as that is a topic that is not actually addressed by 
the present consultation.

Yes, the membership can rest assured under the present Articles and Bylaws that 
plurality voting will be used, but the remainder of the ARIN Election Processes 
are entirely under the control of the ARIN Board of Trustees with nominal 
constraints given in ARIN Bylaws; i.e. the present Articles and Bylaws provide 
the Board of Trustees rather generous latitude in establishment of the Election 
processes and already the Bylaws substantially allow "the board to adopt any 
process it so chooses at any time without being subject to review of the 
membership"

The proposed Article and Bylaws change in the consultation does not change this 
latitude in a material manner, other than opening up the possible use of a STV 
voting system rather than the Virginia default of plurality.    I understand 
that you?re suggesting that there should be much less Board latitude in 
establishing of ARIN?s Election Processes, but to some extent that is an 
orthogonal question to whether the ARIN Board be allowed to adopt election 
processes that specify STV voting model.

Thanks,
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
American Registry for Internet Numbers

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/attachments/20220107/5f7e35c4/attachment-0001.htm>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 18:18:44 +0000
From: Adam Thompson <[email protected]>
To: John Curran <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [ARIN-consult] Consultation on Implementing Single
        Transferrable Voting for ARIN Elections
Message-ID:
        
<yqxpr01mb63263bf8c8163a61e895109b9b...@yqxpr01mb6326.canprd01.prod.outlook.com>
        
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

There?s a disconnect here, then, that apparently ARIN staff and/or the board 
didn?t foresee.

STV?  Yes, please.
The specific amendments proposed?  No.  I?d rather be stuck with FPTP.

-Adam

Adam Thompson
Consultant, Infrastructure Services
[MERLIN]
100 - 135 Innovation Drive
Winnipeg, MB, R3T 6A8
(204) 977-6824 or 1-800-430-6404 (MB only)
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
www.merlin.mb.ca<http://www.merlin.mb.ca/>

From: John Curran <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 7, 2022 12:06 PM
To: Adam Thompson <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ARIN-consult] Consultation on Implementing Single Transferrable 
Voting for ARIN Elections

Adam -

Yes, one could consider it a bug or a feature, depending on perspective.   It 
is, however, not the question being asked of the consultation, which rather 
seeks to ask ?Should the ARIN Board of Trustees be able to specify use of the 
non-plurality model of STV for ARIN elections, including necessary changes to 
the Articles and Bylaws to allow that??

(I have no objection to more specific constraints on ARIN election processes in 
the Bylaws, but would suggest that such be done only to enshrine a successful 
approach that?s been proven after several years of operating experience...)

Thanks,
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
American Registry for Internet Numbers


On 7 Jan 2022, at 9:55 AM, Adam Thompson 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

I get your point? but that?s a bug, not a feature.  What you?ve described below 
is precisely the problem we?re now noticing, or becoming aware of.
-Adam

Adam Thompson
Consultant, Infrastructure Services
<image001.png>
100 - 135 Innovation Drive
Winnipeg, MB, R3T 6A8
(204) 977-6824 or 1-800-430-6404 (MB only)
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
www.merlin.mb.ca<http://www.merlin.mb.ca/>

From: ARIN-consult 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf 
Of John Curran
Sent: Friday, January 7, 2022 11:38 AM
To: Owen DeLong <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [ARIN-consult] Consultation on Implementing Single Transferrable 
Voting for ARIN Elections

On 7 Jan 2022, at 9:15 AM, Owen DeLong 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
...
Currently, the membership is able to have faith that the board will not 
unilaterally move away from majority election of directors because
Virginia law forbids it without a change to the articles of incorporation that 
they would have to approve.

The blanket language proposed in the current change, however, would allow the 
board to adopt any process it so chooses at any
time without being subject to review of the membership.

I think many, myself included, would like to see some level of check and 
balance requiring membership and/or community involvement
and consideration in changing the election process(es) rather than writing a 
blank check for the board to do whatever it likes in this
regard.

Owen -

For clarity, I?d like to address the question you raise about Board latitude in 
ARIN election processes, as that is a topic that is not actually addressed by 
the present consultation.

Yes, the membership can rest assured under the present Articles and Bylaws that 
plurality voting will be used, but the remainder of the ARIN Election Processes 
are entirely under the control of the ARIN Board of Trustees with nominal 
constraints given in ARIN Bylaws; i.e. the present Articles and Bylaws provide 
the Board of Trustees rather generous latitude in establishment of the Election 
processes and already the Bylaws substantially allow "the board to adopt any 
process it so chooses at any time without being subject to review of the 
membership"

The proposed Article and Bylaws change in the consultation does not change this 
latitude in a material manner, other than opening up the possible use of a STV 
voting system rather than the Virginia default of plurality.    I understand 
that you?re suggesting that there should be much less Board latitude in 
establishing of ARIN?s Election Processes, but to some extent that is an 
orthogonal question to whether the ARIN Board be allowed to adopt election 
processes that specify STV voting model.

Thanks,
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
American Registry for Internet Numbers

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/attachments/20220107/3e4c2c0b/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2687 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: 
<https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/attachments/20220107/3e4c2c0b/attachment.png>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
ARIN-consult mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-consult


------------------------------

End of ARIN-consult Digest, Vol 87, Issue 8
*******************************************

Reply via email to