Send ARIN-consult mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-consult
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of ARIN-consult digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Consultation on Implementing Single Transferrable Voting
      for ARIN Elections (Azinger, Marla)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 21:57:51 +0000
From: "Azinger, Marla" <[email protected]>
To: Adam Thompson <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
        <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
        <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [ARIN-consult] Consultation on Implementing Single
        Transferrable Voting for ARIN Elections
Message-ID:
        
<mw4pr06mb83167877f1e17d1587bad43ee4...@mw4pr06mb8316.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
        
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

To identify the abusers you would simply have to look at the list of voters and 
what ORG ID?s they have control over. If they don?t work for the company they 
shouldn?t be controlling its votes.

I don?t agree that proxy should exist. And yes it is another form of voter 
abuse. Clearly, we will not agree on this.

Marla Azinger | SPVR, IP Management
O 585-413-9128 | [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
[cid:[email protected]][cid:[email protected]] 
[cid:[email protected]]  [cid:[email protected]]  
www.frontier.com<http://www.frontier.com>


From: Adam Thompson <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2022 1:54 PM
To: Azinger, Marla <[email protected]>; [email protected]; 
[email protected]
Subject: RE: [ARIN-consult] Consultation on Implementing Single Transferrable 
Voting for ARIN Elections

There are two big reasons: apathy and limited staff time.  Most small ISPs 
simply don?t care about ARIN governance, 99.999% of the time, and don?t have 
time to learn enough to discover how/what/when/where they should care.  ARIN is 
just a force of nature they have to content with when they need more resources?

In general, I don?t agree with you, at least not entirely: if a contractor is 
voting in the best interests of a client, with the client?s full knowledge, and 
is doing so for more than one client simultaneously, that?s still 100% legit.  
Expecting company owners to maintain a PoC and vote is not realistic, at least 
based on all the company owners I know (with perhaps a lone exception).  And 
there is validation, of sorts: if someone votes against the interests of their 
client, a) they?re cutting their own throat, albeit indirectly, and b) if it?s 
discovered, they likely get fired or equivalent.

So If someone has voting rights for an org that they have no legal/contractual 
relationship with, then that?s an odd situation.  Either it?s ?legacy?, i.e. 
left over from when it was legit, which is very hard to fix in general, or it?s 
a situation that probably should never have happened in the first place.  I?d 
be happy to see ways to solve those problems? assuming there?s any evidence 
whatsoever that it?s actually a problem in the first place.

-Adam

Adam Thompson
Consultant, Infrastructure Services
[MERLIN]
100 - 135 Innovation Drive
Winnipeg, MB, R3T 6A8
(204) 977-6824 or 1-800-430-6404 (MB only)
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
www.merlin.mb.ca<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.merlin.mb.ca/__;!!M2UytebrhrTR!eqdKUWFgrdNnlUOh2EI-oFETtgpJtz7T7PmhXF9h3YIx1XAMo5-wLaC2LnrmVsNx$>

From: Azinger, Marla <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2022 3:01 PM
To: Adam Thompson <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [ARIN-consult] Consultation on Implementing Single Transferrable 
Voting for ARIN Elections

If ARIN is looking for people that actually want to be involved to cast the 
voting and really care, the votes would best be cast by anything other than a 
proxy.

I find proxy voters don?t always care what the desire of the company is and 
there is no validation being done they casted votes how the owner of the vote 
would actually want.

I?m not a fan of proxy this day in age.  Proxy to me is a throw back to before 
online voting occurred. There?s no reason a company cant vote on their own.


Marla Azinger | SPVR, IP Management
O 585-413-9128 | [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
[cid:[email protected]][cid:[email protected]][cid:[email protected]]
 [cid:[email protected]]  
www.frontier.com<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.frontier.com__;!!M2UytebrhrTR!eqdKUWFgrdNnlUOh2EI-oFETtgpJtz7T7PmhXF9h3YIx1XAMo5-wLaC2LofU2RgS$>


From: Adam Thompson <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2022 12:02 PM
To: Azinger, Marla <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [ARIN-consult] Consultation on Implementing Single Transferrable 
Voting for ARIN Elections

Not sure that?s low-hanging fruit, tbh.  Besides MERLIN, I still have voting 
rights for ? 3? local ISPs, who are all aware of that and OK with that.  In any 
other arena, that?s just holding a proxy vote, which is not a big deal.
What sort of problems have you seen in this area (that I obviously haven?t)?
-Adam

Adam Thompson
Consultant, Infrastructure Services
[MERLIN]
100 - 135 Innovation Drive
Winnipeg, MB, R3T 6A8
(204) 977-6824 or 1-800-430-6404 (MB only)
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
www.merlin.mb.ca<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.merlin.mb.ca/__;!!M2UytebrhrTR!c2ZEjGLTpLzzB0NcqRhddq0ebLp4mUbzhD5ajlW6BmGWGO6t7IJUsP104NmK_RnB$>

From: ARIN-consult 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf 
Of Azinger, Marla
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2022 1:53 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [ARIN-consult] Consultation on Implementing Single Transferrable 
Voting for ARIN Elections

All of this is gaming no matter how you slice it.

Silly me. I looked at the title and thought efforts were under way to stop one 
person from casting votes for companies they don?t actually work for but I 
didn?t read that in the write up.  I would have thought we?d start there? if 
anything needs modification?

Marla Azinger | SPVR, IP Management
O 585-413-9128 | [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
[cid:[email protected]][cid:[email protected]][cid:[email protected]]
 [cid:[email protected]]  
www.frontier.com<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.frontier.com__;!!M2UytebrhrTR!c2ZEjGLTpLzzB0NcqRhddq0ebLp4mUbzhD5ajlW6BmGWGO6t7IJUsP104CKB559o$>


From: ARIN-consult 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf 
Of Andrew Dul
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2022 11:40 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [ARIN-consult] Consultation on Implementing Single Transferrable 
Voting for ARIN Elections

________________________________
WARNING: External email. Please verify sender before opening attachments or 
clicking on links.
________________________________

Perhaps a simple question, but "how" will the current board insure that future 
board(s) do not capriciously change the election mechanisms in the future?

Making the changes to the "election process" subject to a majority vote of the 
membership and having that right inserted into the bylaws might be one method...

Thanks,
Andrew

On 1/7/2022 10:31 AM, Peter Harrison wrote:
Adam,

As stated before, it is the Board's fiduciary responsibility to ensure that a 
change of this magnitude is equitable and not vulnerable to capricious change. 
We will act appropriately based on this feedback.

Peter


On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 10:03 AM Adam Thompson 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Peter, I don?t have a problem with STV.  I do have a problem with the board 
having the latitude ? unfettered ? to keep changing voting systems without 
further bylaw amendments.  The type of voting structure, particularly when 
deviating from the norm that?s baked into Virginia law, should then be baked 
into the bylaws so that it can?t change in the middle of the night, perhaps 
even during an election.

Do I trust the current board to not pull stuff like that?  Yeah, probably, I 
think...  (In fact, can I even name the current board members?  No.  But that?s 
a different problem.)  Am I willing to blindly trust every future board that 
might exist?  Absolutely not.  I?ve seen how boards can be co-opted, 
infiltrated, and/or ?turned to the dark side? (so to speak) elsewhere.

As far as the consultation?s goal to determine whether STV is OK or not?  Yes, 
it is good.  This is an excellent move overall.

-Adam

Adam Thompson
Consultant, Infrastructure Services
[MERLIN]
100 - 135 Innovation Drive
Winnipeg, MB, R3T 6A8
(204) 977-6824 or 1-800-430-6404 (MB only)
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
www.merlin.mb.ca<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.merlin.mb.ca/__;!!M2UytebrhrTR!ZZ9nY7Iqm8q8pZkxsQXDwXKKBYnBxxrhgUQsk72I0lQSknZQozPO16VzGTEuxAE9$>

From: ARIN-consult 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf 
Of Peter Harrison
Sent: Friday, January 7, 2022 11:53 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [ARIN-consult] Consultation on Implementing Single Transferrable 
Voting for ARIN Elections

Dear Community,


With STV there are many ways to re-allocate votes, and new ones may be 
invented. The videos presented previously illustrated one method.


This link explains some of the options: 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranked_voting#Comparison_of_ranked_voting_methods<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranked_voting*Comparison_of_ranked_voting_methods__;Iw!!M2UytebrhrTR!ZZ9nY7Iqm8q8pZkxsQXDwXKKBYnBxxrhgUQsk72I0lQSknZQozPO16VzGa2rUE66$>


We will need to balance the range of options with those provided by current and 
future vendors of ARIN?s voting systems. Investigations are being made by staff 
and they will make recommendations to the board based on their research into 
our needs, best practices, practicability, relative merit, legal implications 
and systems availability.


The purpose of the consultation is to get a sense of whether this is a good 
idea overall. The board will work hard to ensure that we are working in the 
best interest of the members and the region they serve when evaluating the 
choices presented.


As John explained, the bylaw modification was made to accommodate multiple 
forms of voting that may be required in future. The concern that this could 
lead to opportunistic changes to systems each election cycle is sound. We will 
investigate ways to ensure this does not happen with possible bylaw wording to 
meet these and other goals.


The Governance Working Group has worked very closely with both the executive 
team and staff on this consultation. Their support for a workable solution and 
concern for the membership has been evident every step of the way. These 
consultations are the result of over two years of research and were not taken 
lightly. We will continue to work to maintain this excellent collaboration.


Thank you for your feedback.

Peter


_______________________________________________

ARIN-Consult

You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Consult 
Mailing

List ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>).

Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:

https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-consult<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-consult__;!!M2UytebrhrTR!ZZ9nY7Iqm8q8pZkxsQXDwXKKBYnBxxrhgUQsk72I0lQSknZQozPO16VzGbGFSPIU$>
 Please contact the ARIN Member Services

Help Desk at [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> if you experience any issues.



________________________________

This communication is confidential. Frontier only sends and receives email on 
the basis of the terms set out at 
http://www.frontier.com/email_disclaimer<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.frontier.com/email_disclaimer__;!!M2UytebrhrTR!c2ZEjGLTpLzzB0NcqRhddq0ebLp4mUbzhD5ajlW6BmGWGO6t7IJUsP104GNyv2aK$>.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/attachments/20220110/dded7551/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5179 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: 
<https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/attachments/20220110/dded7551/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1538 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: 
<https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/attachments/20220110/dded7551/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1456 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: 
<https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/attachments/20220110/dded7551/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1642 bytes
Desc: image004.png
URL: 
<https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/attachments/20220110/dded7551/attachment-0003.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2687 bytes
Desc: image005.png
URL: 
<https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/attachments/20220110/dded7551/attachment-0004.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5180 bytes
Desc: image006.png
URL: 
<https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/attachments/20220110/dded7551/attachment-0005.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1537 bytes
Desc: image007.png
URL: 
<https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/attachments/20220110/dded7551/attachment-0006.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image008.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1456 bytes
Desc: image008.png
URL: 
<https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/attachments/20220110/dded7551/attachment-0007.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image009.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1641 bytes
Desc: image009.png
URL: 
<https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/attachments/20220110/dded7551/attachment-0008.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image010.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5179 bytes
Desc: image010.png
URL: 
<https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/attachments/20220110/dded7551/attachment-0009.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image011.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1538 bytes
Desc: image011.png
URL: 
<https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/attachments/20220110/dded7551/attachment-0010.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image012.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1456 bytes
Desc: image012.png
URL: 
<https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/attachments/20220110/dded7551/attachment-0011.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image013.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1642 bytes
Desc: image013.png
URL: 
<https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/attachments/20220110/dded7551/attachment-0012.png>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
ARIN-consult mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-consult


------------------------------

End of ARIN-consult Digest, Vol 87, Issue 18
********************************************

Reply via email to