Send ARIN-PPML mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of ARIN-PPML digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: ARIN-prop-183 Section 8.4 Transfer enhancement (Brian Johnson)
2. Weekly posting summary for [email protected] (Thomas Narten)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 19:26:50 +0000
From: Brian Johnson <[email protected]>
To: David Farmer <[email protected]>, Martin Hannigan
<[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-183 Section 8.4 Transfer
enhancement
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of David Farmer
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 9:54 AM
> To: Martin Hannigan
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-183 Section 8.4 Transfer enhancement
>
> On 10/30/12 15:32 , Martin Hannigan wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 4:11 PM, David Farmer <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...
> >> Section 8.4 is fairly specific that there needs to be a reciprocal policy
> >> at
> >> the other RIR, if you remember I argued against that, but that is ARIN's
> >> policy.
> >
> > +1
> >
> >> I'm willing to accept this on to the docket in order to not create a
> >> catch-22, and make it clear ARIN is willing to consider this of other RIRs
> >> are too. However, I'm not sure significant effort should be put into it
> >> until at least ASN transfers have been proposed at another RIR.
> >
> > Why bother working on policy if you aren't going to take it seriously?
> > That also implies that we don't take registry accuracy seriously FWIW.
>
> I do take this policy seriously and even support it. But without
> reciprocal policy at another RIR this is actually an irrelevant piece of
> policy. So unless there is some sign of another RIR taking up the
> issue, I believe the ARIN community has more important and timely issues
> to work on.
I think we need to curb our desire to be flippant.
I agree with Martin that this is a valid topic and agree with David that this
is a lower priority until we have other RIRs in discussion on the issue.
>
> As a sign of good faith to the other RIRs I'd be willing to take this on
> the docket, I don't want to send the message we're not interested, like
> I said I support this. However, without some sign of another RIR
> taking up the issue, I couldn't in good faith prioritizes this over
> other policy issues. I'm not saying it can't or won't get worked on,
> but that just about everything else should probably take priority over
> it, unless there is activity on the issue in another RIR.
>
+1 for putting this on the docket. It will show other RIRs that it is on our
radar and that we will need reciprocal policy to implement it.
- Brian
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 00:53:03 -0400
From: Thomas Narten <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [arin-ppml] Weekly posting summary for [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Total of 43 messages in the last 7 days.
script run at: Fri Nov 2 00:53:03 EDT 2012
Messages | Bytes | Who
--------+------+--------+----------+------------------------
11.63% | 5 | 8.92% | 31469 | [email protected]
9.30% | 4 | 8.98% | 31699 | [email protected]
9.30% | 4 | 7.44% | 26249 | [email protected]
6.98% | 3 | 8.88% | 31327 | [email protected]
6.98% | 3 | 7.17% | 25290 | [email protected]
6.98% | 3 | 6.89% | 24301 | [email protected]
6.98% | 3 | 6.65% | 23451 | [email protected]
6.98% | 3 | 6.35% | 22413 | [email protected]
4.65% | 2 | 6.61% | 23319 | [email protected]
4.65% | 2 | 4.86% | 17146 | [email protected]
4.65% | 2 | 4.64% | 16381 | [email protected]
2.33% | 1 | 4.26% | 15026 | [email protected]
2.33% | 1 | 3.70% | 13047 | [email protected]
2.33% | 1 | 3.41% | 12036 | [email protected]
2.33% | 1 | 2.11% | 7436 | [email protected]
2.33% | 1 | 2.02% | 7118 | [email protected]
2.33% | 1 | 1.89% | 6655 | [email protected]
2.33% | 1 | 1.82% | 6436 | [email protected]
2.33% | 1 | 1.78% | 6276 | [email protected]
2.33% | 1 | 1.63% | 5759 | [email protected]
--------+------+--------+----------+------------------------
100.00% | 43 |100.00% | 352834 | Total
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
End of ARIN-PPML Digest, Vol 89, Issue 2
****************************************
