On Jun 5, 2013, at 7:11 PM, Jimmy Hess <[email protected]> wrote: > I think the implementation of policy shifts to stricter and stricter > review and requirements, is already an established fact, not a proposal?
Stricter review, but the same policy requirements as before. > Isn't continuously "tightening the needs based policies" what the > "IPV4 Countdown plan" is all about? It is not about any policy changes, simply additional effort on behalf of the staff to insure consistency in the final IPv4 resource issuances. This is actually quite similar to what was done in both APNIC and RIPE at they approached runout of their regional free pools. > "PHASE FOUR (ONE /8 EQUIVALENT REMAINING)" > "All requests of any size will be subject to team review." > "The hold period for returned, reclaimed, and revoked blocks will be > reduced to one month." > > I read this as "a higher standard of need" and "higher standard of > proof" will be required, as the pool shrinks; divided into 4 > phases. No higher standard of need or proof, simply more staff eyes performing the review against the present policy criteria. FYI, /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
