On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Chris Grundemann <[email protected]> wrote: > 1) Do you support the principle of efficient utilization based on need > (Conservation/Sustainability)?
No. I support the practice but not the principle. Use of the concept of justified need should be pragmatic not dogmatic. Where another practice can be shown to be more effective at achieving sustainability, no guiding principles should dissuade us from using it. > 2) Do you support the principle of hierarchical aggregation (Routability)? No. I support facilitating scalable routing as a principle. Depending on the technology of the day and the intended use of the addresses, this might or might not include aggregation of any sort, let alone hierarchical aggregation. > 3) Do you support the principle of uniqueness (Registration)? Yes. > 4) Do you support the goal of balancing these principles with each > other under the overarching principle of Stewardship? No. As offered, the notion of stewardship is fuzzy bordering incoherent. It justifies anything and nothing. If it's desirable to offer guidance as to how to break a tie when principles conflict then let's do just that instead. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
