On 11-Jul-13 13:32, Mike Burns wrote: >> I have not seen anyone propose that we dismantle the existing >> paradigm (save those who wish to drop needs assessments completely) >> nor anyone proposing a new ongoing audit and revocation mechanism. >> Let's stick to the facts and proposals that are on the table, I'm >> passionately against the slaughter of unicorns but I doubt that's >> relevant to this discussion... > > You are the one proposing change here. > And even though there are not currently any proposals on the table to > begin auditing and revokations, the placement of the conservation > principle in the NRPM with the assertion that it covers all addresses > will act to bolster any such pending proposal. That's why I am opposed > to the proposal.
We already have a reclamation process; see NRPM 12 and the enabling language in the RSA. ARIN hasn't used it much/any to date except in cases of suspected fraud, which IMHO is a dereliction of its duty, but it _has_ been used. Therefore, any proposal to "begin" using it would be moot. S -- Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
