On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Matthew Petach <[email protected]> wrote: > The concern I have with "plurality" is that that I may not know > with certainty that a new request will meet that definition; I may > intend for it to be split 50/40/10 between ARIN/RIPE/LACNIC > regions; but then upon deployment, discover that the LACNIC > backbone nodes required more space than expected, as did > RIPE, and my split ends up being 40/45/15. Now it's no longer > a plurality of space in the ARIN region. It's easier to plan to > hit a target percentage than try to hit a multi-way ratio given > the unpredictable and changeable forces that impact real > world rollouts.
This. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
