On Sep 25, 2013, at 4:04 PM, William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Owen DeLong <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Sep 25, 2013, at 3:15 PM, William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> What permits, licenses or other government paperwork would a German
>>> company need to own a few routers in Ashburn, buy telco DSL lines on
>>> behalf of lata 236 customers and provide Internet access there?
>>
>> It's possible that they don't need anything, in which case, they are legally
>> operating there without needing any licenses or permits.
>
> As a Virginian, I'll help you out: in at least one version of that
> scenario, they in fact don't need anything.
>
>
> (Proposal Draft: Organizations ... must provide proof that they [are] legally
> operating within the ARIN service region)
>
Proof in that case would be:
1. Proof that they are an active business entity
2. A statement that no additional permits or licenses are required
to operate in their present location(s).
Again, still not seeing a problem.
>>> ARIN is not qualified to assess [whether an organization is
>>> operating legally within the region] and would have a very
>>> difficult time doing so.
>>
>> I don't see that as a serious issue.
>
> The cognitive dissonance has blown my mind.
You'll have to be more clear about what you are perceiving as cognitive
dissonance, as I do not perceive any.
Owen
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
