On 1/10/14, 13:45 , Martin Hannigan wrote:

At the end of the day, you're still technically a PNI.  Bill Woodycock
had it right when he said it's easy to get a third party. I think it's a
reasonable requirement, without the extra capital requirements.

I think you are miss-paraphrasing Bill. I think Bill was making the point once a couple networks peer with each other at an exchange frequently others follow quickly behind. But it sometimes takes the first two too break the ice, before you will get the other networks to follow. In some cases it maybe a road block to get the first three participants to peer to qualify for a IXP block.

I think I agree with you that a third participant is probably a lower barrier in most cases, than a route server. But, I think two participants and a route server shows a clear intent to be an exchange and is differentiable from a PNI. The intent wasn't meant as a requirement for a route server, but an option, not all exchange points have the same circumstances. We are looking for what the minimum is to justify an exchange point.

1. If the community prefers just three participants, I'd ok with that.

2. If the community wants to allow a route server to be one of the three participants, I'd ok with that too.

3. But, I agree with you that simply two participants by themselves is insufficiently differentiable from PNI.

And, someone else made the point that this wouldn't extend the free pool for any amount of time. That is true, but that's not the intent of this. The intent is to ensure that the CI reservations that should be available will beyond the free pool are actually only use for their intended purpose. And that there are not loopholes left open for abuse of these special reservation. To date I believe the other requirements were sufficient to discourage abuse. However, that may not be true when all we have are these special reservation.

--
================================================
David Farmer               Email: [email protected]
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE     Phone: 1-612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029  Cell: 1-612-812-9952
================================================
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to