On Jan 23, 2014, at 6:28 AM, Morizot Timothy S <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Actually, since the Board is elected by the community and its members are not ARIN employees, it seems to me that their actions in suspending policy represent an extension of the ARIN community’s self-governance. The board is, ultimately, accountable to those of us who elected them. John and other staff at ARIN do not, I believe, have any authority to suspend or alter policy themselves. So John’s statements that ARIN’s role is to implement and facilitate community-based self-governance are not deflated at all by this action. The activities of the AC and the Board are an integral part of that self-governance by the community. Scott - You are correct (i.e. the Board is duly elected by the members and ultimately has responsibilities to them and ARIN's mission.) Steven is also correct, to the extent that it is noted that the Board takes advice from the ARIN Advisory Council (hence the "Advisory" in its name) on policy matters, and the AC follows ARIN's Policy Development Process (PDP) for consultation with the community. The Board has nicely constrained its actions predominantly to ratification of recommended draft policies but it does have geater powers which are elaborated in the PDP. The authority does ultimately rest with the Board, but even in taking this action, it is following the published processes which call for ARIN AC review and community consultation, thus allowing for safe discussion of the issues involved without the problematic policy being active at the same time. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
