On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Andrew Dul <[email protected]> wrote:
> > At this time I'm opposed to this policy. While I agree this text is out > of date and probably should be updated. I don't necessarily agree that > the section should just be removed. Reverse DNS is an important part of I am in agreement, and oppose the policy as written; the section should not be removed. The section explains when it is the resource-holder's responsibility to maintain IN-ADDR's, and also: when ARIN may host the IN-ADDRs. It just needs some minor tweaking to include and distinguish between IPv6 and IPv4 IN-ADDRs > Andrew > -- -JH
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
