On Feb 23, 2014, at 11:50 AM, Rudolph Daniel <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
This may seem a stupid question, but since we now want to accept that accuracy is a principle task of registries, what measure are we to use as an acceptable measure of an accurate 'whois' or at the macro level, ' an accurate registry service' ?......% of legacy holders participating on the registry? It's actually a fairly complicated question, since there are many legacy holder who already participate in the registry and update their resources (e.g. abuse contact, DNS servers) without any formal contractual relationship with ARIN. In any case, individual legacy holders are unlikely to be the major contributor of inaccuracy in the registry when compared to those parties who fail to update the registry with their reassignment information (despite the requirement to do so per NRPM 4.2.3.7.) We do know that many folks are quite good about making updates before they request more IPv4 space, but that's unlikely to be a significant motivator for much longer... FYI, /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
