Spam Auditor.... Are you FOR or AGAINST the proposal in general....and does your 'Hear, Here' include David's support for option #3? Thanks, bd
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Spam Auditor <[email protected]>wrote: > On 14-03-05 01:17 PM, David Huberman wrote: > >> As the author of this proposal, and having encountered the real-world >> consequences of existing 8.4 anti-flip language, I support #3 as the >> cleanest, simplest approach that best promotes Whois accuracy. >> >> ARIN is a registry, not a regulator. Let's write policy that promotes >> accuracy in Whois, please. >> >> *David R Huberman* >> Microsoft Corporation >> Senior IT/OPS Program Manager (GFS) >> > > Here, Here... > > However, even though it isn't a regulator, there should be enforcement > considerations, especially when IP Space is granted and used for purposes > contrary to the application.. > > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
