On 14-03-10 09:54 AM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Just playing the devil's advocate, but that is the only reason I can see for
not increasing it to three or more..
>
>Any reason two small rural players shouldn't start with a PA /30 and renumber
into a larger block if/when they get a third participant?
>
>Unless someone has a good argument for why that's an excessive burden, support
changing 2 to 3.
>
Would you entertain more than 3?
Best,
-M<
If the outside argument I mentioned is not something that would make
anyone reconsider, then it might as well be more than 3..
--
"Catch the Magic of Linux..."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Peddemors, President/CEO LinuxMagic Inc.
Visit us at http://www.linuxmagic.com @linuxmagic
Remember, the N.A. ISP/Telecom Conference/Cruise Aug 2-9, 2014
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A Wizard IT Company - For More Info http://www.wizard.ca
"LinuxMagic" a Registered TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
604-682-0300 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada
This email and any electronic data contained are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed.
Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely
those of the author and are not intended to represent those of the company.
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
