On 10 Mar 2014, at 16:57, Michael Peddemors <[email protected]> wrote:
> While on the surface this might seem prudent, it may be onerous for smaller
> players. More information might be needed to determine adverse cases, or
> possibly some exemption for rural players that might not be able to attain a
> 3rd participant.
If it is two players then it is a Private Interconnect.
You need three to have an exchange. More than three is no different.
f
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
