On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 04:05:47PM +0000, Azinger, Marla wrote: > > I believe a balance between familiarity, hitting a productive > stride, burn out and mind melting needs to be balanced out with > fresh able minds. I also believe a solid 3 year break is needed for > people to re-integrate as a non-AC person and regroup. Leaving > anyone on a committee for more than 6 years opens the door to > stagnation, burn out, and conformity of thinking.
So, why make a rule about this instead of trusting the voting members (and the people sitting) to get it right? That is, I agree with everything you say, but I don't understand why the solution to that is to make an absolute rule that can never be violated in exceptional cases. What problem are you trying to solve? A -- Andrew Sullivan [email protected] _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
