On 3/28/14, 11:57 , Bill Buhler wrote:
So if my understanding is correct, they basically performed a routing
man in the middle attack on live IPv6 prefixes. Pardon my understanding
level, but how did they keep from creating routing loops and service
interruptions. I’m also a little concerned about performance and link
loads. Are my concerns legitimate and inline?
Thanks,
--Bill
This absolutely WAS NOT an attack. They announced a covering prefix,
only traffic with no more specific route would follow this route. Think
more specific default route.
--
================================================
David Farmer Email: [email protected]
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952
================================================
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
