Hmm. That prefix appears to be part of a pre ARIN "acquisition conspiracy"
Any details? Best, -M< On Wednesday, April 9, 2014, Jay Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi John and community, > > > one of the reasons why the community should oppose the 2014-02 and 2014-09 > as follows, The unfair system only benefits some big firms. > > > Recently, there is one inter-rir transfer and i would like to discuss the > story behind the scene. > > *ipv4|167.220.224.0/19|American <http://167.220.224.0/19%7CAmerican> > Registry for Internet Numbers/MOPL|AP|ARIN|20140109|Microsoft Singapore > Pte. Ltd.|SG|APNIC|20140408* > > > 1. it's original parent block is 167.220.0.0/16 ( now has been split into > smaller blocks) and has been announced by as3598 and as8071 but this one > has been used in Singapore ( out of region use.) and its ARIN whois regi > info shows country code:SG. I guess no wondering David is so caring > about the Out of Region policy too. Even without this policy, Big firm can > always do what they want to do. > > > 2. Let's talk about 2014-02 anti flip language, this inter-rir > transferred /19 belongs to MICROSOFT-GP-NET. I guess this account of > miscrosoft has not received any ARIN IPv4 in the previous 12months. > otherwise, ARIN will not approve this transfer. Hello community, please > help to recheck to see if MICROSOFT-GP-NET has been allocated ARIN IPv4 > within the past 12months. > > > Besides this account, Miscrosft has MSFT which has just received > 23.96.0.0/13 from ARIN free pool and has MICROSOFT this maybe the > one who buy large amount of IPs from the bankruptcy organisation. ( > they also have other ARIN accounts and the above two works as the examples > here) > > > No wondering David so cares about 2014-02 and 2014-09 to get rid of > policy restriction to have their IPs either in account MSFT and account > MICROSOFT to be transferred into Microsoft Singapore Pte. Ltd. ( i guess > its apnic account is miscrosoft-ap or something similar) > > > The ARIN 33 is just at the corner, we should seriously discuss this > 2014-2 and 2014-09 and I think the policy should not be established to > favour someone specific, policy should favour the whole community and > balance the benefits of all shareholders in ARIN region. > > > Jay > > > > > > Sample IPs belongs to MICROSOFT as follows, > > > 137.116.0.0/16 > > > Microsoft Corp > > legacy > > > > > 137.117.0.0/16 > > > Microsoft Corp > > legacy > > > > > 137.135.0.0/16 > > > Microsoft Corp > > legacy > > > > > 138.91.0.0/16 > > > Microsoft Corp > > legacy > > > > > 141.251.0.0/16 > > > Microsoft Corp > > legacy > > > > > 131.253.1.0/24 > > > Microsoft Corp > > legacy > > > > > > > > > > > 131.253.128.0/17 > > > Microsoft Corp > > legacy > > > > > 132.245.0.0/16 > > > Microsoft Corp > > legacy > > > > > 134.170.0.0/16 > > > Microsoft Corp > > legacy > > > > > 134.177.0.0/16 > > > Microsoft Corp > > legacy > >
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
