I'm confused.
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014, Azinger, Marla wrote:
No support. Right now I don't think it confuses anyone as stated in the rational
I'm not finding a reference to confusion in the documentation for this
Recommended Draft Policy. Could you please share the link?
and it just clarifies something ARIN staff will ask
for.
It was stated that ARIN staff are not asking for this information
regarding virtual web hosting. What is being clarified here?
They ask some companies for detailed router output (which in some cases
is not even possible) and they won?t take time to analyze
domain details? Which btw if they are legitimate they are very easy to provide.
I'm sorry, but I don't get the relevance of what staff may or may not do
WRT unrelated policies when considering the merits of a proposal.
Additionally I use this policy to beat back bogus IP Requests for domains.
This has cut back on BS requested subnet size alot in the
ISP world.
It seems to me that fraudulent requests would be fraudulent with or
without this section, and if not fraudulent, they wouldn't be bogus, but
legitimate.
After all, the existing wording specifies that the information provided is
for informational purposes only. If anything the removal of this text
would strengthen the ability to use a corporate policy emphasizing the use
of name based resolution.
As I said, I'm confused, can you help clarify?
John Springer
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
